Saturday, August 4, 2012

What we can all take away from the Chick-Fil-A fiasco.

In the end, the left looks like a collective mob of insane, crying, children yet again, and the American public can see it on full display. The libs and gays protested the "hate" they perceived to be emanating from Chick-Fil-A by staging "kiss ins", vandalizing property, and bullying sweet teenage girls in drive through windows.

*clap, clap, clap* 

The left has outdone themselves yet again, much in the same way they did in the Trayvon Martin aftermath. They spun themselves into a tantrum induced tizzy and before they knew it, Chick-Fil-A looked like the victim and they looked like the aggressors.

The beauty of the free market was demonstrated perfectly during this whole ordeal, with a massive outpouring of support from the public, amply documented by the new media. Why? Because, contrary to the childish and wishful thinking of progressive hipsters, most people don't identify with their bogus, radical, and intolerant views. Beyond that, most people don't support the radical gay agenda. Beyond that, most people are appalled by the treatment given to Chick-Fil-A, simply because a bunch of liberals with their panties in a wad couldn't handle the viewpoints of the company. Homophobic? Well maybe you are Bibliophobic.

You don't have to agree with what they say, but you certainly don't have the right to bar them from opening new restaurants or bullying them into submission, simply because you don't agree with their views. I would like to think most liberals could understand this concept of tolerance and acceptance. Most liberals I do know don't support this Rahm-Bloomberg fascist insanity of shutting down the chain entirely in their fiefdoms, but some radical progressives still entertain this unconstitutional and dangerous idea.

In reality, most progressive liberals are not tolerant. They despise opposing views and wish to bully those who hold them into silence. It has happened here countless times on this blog, so this intolerant bullying is no surprise to me. Well it didn't work this time. It backfired like a spectacular fireworks show going up in smoke all at once, and in the end it was Chick-Fil-A, not the poor gays, that the American public has sided with. 


Gorges Smythe said...

It was sure that way in my town. Ours was so packed that I had to down the street to gay-loving, Pepsico-owned Taco Bell for lunch. I'll try to make it to Chick-Fil-A later this week.

Anonymous said...

This, I cant help but feel, Is the very last part of our formally strong republic. We are Holding on for dear life, the god given rights that our country was founded on. I cannot stand godless attacks on christians. To put it simply, Its two different worlds.

FreeThinke said...

"You don't have to agree with what they say, but you certainly don't have the right to bar them from opening new restaurants or bullying them into submission, simply because you don't agree with their views."

That is the point that needs to be emphasized and re-emphasized till all sides of this stupid divide understand and accept it.

What leftist "leaders" tried to do was out of whack and out of bounds, unconstitutional -- and frankly hysterical.

~ FreeThinke

Silverfiddle said...

Do these agitators really think kissing one another and shoving it in our faces brings us closer to their side?

No. They just love being provocative. How immature.

Left Coast Rebel said...

Good post dude. I couldn't believe my eyes when I read the raging "hate" and intolerance of some of my family members/friends on Facebook on this issue. Doncha love it when middle America and the free market speaks?

Kid said...

So, the dems want to block Chick-Fil-A because of the CEO's feelings about gay marriage in a country where free speech is to be revered.
Yet at the same time, they support mosques being built my muslims who follow islam, which calls for the DEATH of homosexuals.
Not only can they not get married, they can't breathe anymore either.

Can dems and libtards be any more stupid with a capital F?

What a dysfunctional pile of S this country is anymore. Because of liberals.

LibertyAtStake said...

I wonder if the Mittens campaign can afford to have 1000 Chick-Fil-A meals delivered to the White House?

Anonymous said...

Hypocrites? By all means, Hypocrite be they name!
Harry Reid wants to see more of Mitt Romney's past income-tax filings. Debbie Wasserman Schultz wants to see 23 years of his taxes. This, from the die-hard supporters of a candidate who will not release his college transcripts or so much more. I want to know how Barack Obama got into Columbia University for undergraduate school.
We learned that Bush, a "C" student with a 77 average, had scored one point higher than Kerry, who graduated with a 76 GPA. Bush got a "D" in astronomy, while Kerry scored four "D" grades as a freshman. That year alone, Kerry scored 68 in each of two history courses and a 69 in political science. Indeed, the media could compare them. I want to know Barack Obama's grades! And I want to know them NOW before the election!
I want to see his application. I want to know who funded his college education.
Did he seek extra consideration, as did Elizabeth Warren in applying for her academic opportunities, by claiming to be a member of a demographic group favored by affirmative action?
Mitt Romney has complied with the law. If the Democrats want to argue that "tradition" implies that presidential candidates should release more tax returns, then tradition also teaches that presidential candidates should release school transcripts.
To slander and defame an American who is a candidate for the Presidency is shameless. Something we already know very well about these lying SOB’s called Liberals, Progressives, Communist Slime balls

Hack said...

Thank you for all the comments!