Left wing hypocrisy when it comes to life and war.

We all know the drill. When a Republican is president during a war, the anti-war, neo-hippies who value human life protest in droves. When a Democrat is president............... ......... ...... .... ... .. . . .

Ex-CIA Interrogator: Obama's War on Terror Is Less Ethical Than Bush's

It is a hypocrisy that reeks of self righteous indifference. Democrats and liberals make hypocrisy an art. When it comes to the of life and war, the party that touts itself as the one fighting for rights, tolerance, peace, and love falls short.

The Democrats' eerie silence during the Obama years on war is much the same as the Republicans' eerie silence on spending during the Bush years. Liberals love to ask, "Where was the tea party during the Bush years?" They have a valid point. But now I ask, "Where in the hell is the anti-war movement during the Obama years?" Gone without a trace. As Warden Norton put it in the Shawshank Redemption..."...up and vanished like a fart in the wind!"

Obama continued military operations both in Iraq and Afghanistan. But let's not stop there. Obama decided to go beyond what Bush could ever dream of, launching military operations in Yemen, Libya, and now has US special forces on the ground in Africa. Drone attacks in Pakistan have jumped from 8 strikes per year under Bush, to a staggering 63 strikes per year under Obama, and that isn't even counting the 8 months remaining in 2012. The Bureau of Investigative Journalism reports 52 total strikes under Bush and 267 under Obama. Still "air raiding villages and killing civilians it seems..."

Oh but wait!

Obama ended the War in Iraq, remember? He put an end to Bush's stupid war. He brought the troops home!  The nonsense is laughable. If you'll recall, anti-war presidential candidate Obama promised throngs of salivating, fainting voters that bringing troops home from Iraq and ending the war would be the very first thing he would do as president. Instead, he stuck to the Bush timetable of 12/31/11 and put Iraq on the backburner while fighting for more important things.

"Obama got Osama!" Now this one really makes me want to vomit. The left actually pretending to care about the war on terrorism or capturing/killing Osama bin Laden. Because this happened under Obama's watch, the anti-war, hippie left is now ecstatic. Not because we killed Osama, but because Obama can take credit for something...anything. Nevermind the fact that the left adamantly opposed all operations in Afghanistan to fight the Taliban or kill Osama, as early as, well, before the invasion even took place in 2001! It's ok though, because Barack Obama is president.

American casualties during the Obama war years have skyrocketed. But the media won't report on that. During Bush's rule, from 2001-2008, 564 US troops died in Afghanistan, an average of 70 a year. During Obama's rule, from 2009-2012, 1314 US troops have died in Afghanistan, an average of 328 a year...and that isn't even counting the remaining 8 months of 2012! Where oh where is peace loving liberal media? Where oh where is the anti-war left?

They are liars and hypocrites.

On the issue of war they have no credibility. Expect the anti-war protests to magically spring to life once again if Mitt Romney wins the election. And if their disgusting, vile indifference towards war isn't bad enough, their hypocrisy on the value of life is even worse.

The party of rights and love and peace and tolerance somehow also seems to be the party that supports extinguishing human life in its most precious, delicate, and early stages...on a mass scale. Life is sacred and the most fundamental human right is life, yet those that tout themselves as the champions of human rights fail to acknowledge this most basic human right.

Yet somehow, these people that claim to love life, who love to protest war and the killing of innocent civilians (when a Republican is in power) and support the aborting of innocent human life strangely DO support the human life of those who have taken innocent human life, in the most diabolic of ways. It couldn't get any more backwards.

Liberals: Fighting for the right to life for Charles Manson, fighting against the right to life for an unborn child, and supporting war, if a Democrat is in charge.

"Our Hero" Ron Paul

Cross posted at RRR. 

Notice the capital "H". This was the latest headline over at The Daily Paul. I am actually taking a course called Cult Behavior 101. My textbook is The Daily Paul.

"Ron in past speeches has referenced the Lord of the Rings. For those of you that are familiar with the story, after hearing what my friend said, it made me think of Ron being Frodo and having to carry such a heavy burden in his quest to destroy the great evil that is close to destroying everything that We, the free peoples of this World hold dear. He carries all of our hopes and dreams. So my friends, My fellow Patriots, I ask you with great humbleness and sincerity, To remember, that we all need to be lifting Ron up and filling him with positive energy and Peace. We all need to be careful, To not drain our Hero in our quest to gain his energy and wisdom. To be mindful, To not increase his burden by placing our expectations on him. He has to be exhausted and overwhelmed. Let us all focus as much consciousness and energy as we can towards Ron, So he can find his balance and some Inner Peace."

Like I have said before, these types don't really fight for freedom. They fight for a figure they want to rely on, a cult of personality, and a Savior.

I wish the 10% of Ron Paul supporters who actually support the message more than the man would openly denounce the cult behavior spewed daily within the Paul ranks.

It is really a shame. Ron Paul had a good message but his candidacy was marred by lunatics and closet liberals within his base. The same happened in 2008 with Truthers, though that has died down a bit in 2012.

Maybe sometime within the next 10 years some of them will admit Ron Paul didn't get the nomination in 2012.

Dan Savage: Obama's favorite homosexual who hates Christians (Video)

Anti-Bullying Speaker Curses Christian Teens

It was supposed to be an anti-bullying conference. Instead, it was a blatant attack on Christianity.

Savage was supposed to be delivering a speech about anti-bullying at the National High School Journalism Conference sponsored by the Journalism Education Association and the National Scholastic Press Association. But it turned into an episode of Christian-bashing. Tuttle said a number of his students were offended by Savage’s remarks – and some decided to leave the auditorium. “It became hostile,” he said. “It felt hostile as we were sitting in the audience – especially towards Christians who espouse beliefs that he was literally taking on.” Tuttle said the speech was laced with vulgarities and “sexual innuendo not appropriate for this age group.” At one point, he said Savage told the teenagers about how good his partner looked in a speedo. The conservative website CitizenLink was the first to report about the controversy. They interviewed a 17-year-old girl who was one of students who walked out of the auditorium. “The first thing he told the audience was, ‘I hope you’re all using birth control,’” she told CitizenLink. “he said there are people using the Bible as an excuse for gay bullying, because it says in Leviticus and Romans that being gay is wrong. Right after that, he said we can ignore all the (expletive deleted) in the Bible.” As the teenagers were walking out, Tuttle said that Savage heckled them and called them pansy-assed. “You can tell the Bible guys in the hall they can come back now because I’m done beating up the Bible,” Savage said as other students hollered and cheered. “It’s funny as someone who is on the receiving end of beatings that are justified by the Bible how pansy-assed people react when you push back.”

 The speech was delivered by militant man lover Dan Savage. His pointed attack on Christians under the guise of tolerance is typical of the left wing.

Dan Savage is your typical liberal. He preaches tolerance, peace, and love for everyone. Unless you are a Christian. Ironically, Muslims are exempt.

Bottom line: Dan Savage engages in disgusting, backwards, unnatural acts that are counter to human anatomy and the natural world.

No amount of Bible bashing can change these facts.

Note: The Obama administration is completely behind Dan Savage. (pun intended) The same Dan Savage that said he wished "All Republicans were f*****g dead." and that he wanted to "F*** the S*** out of Rick Santorum."

Immigration no longer requires assimilation.

Some time ago I wrote a post, more of a rant than anything, on extreme multiculturalism. I included President Teddy Roosevelt's wise words of wisdom on the topic.

"The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities."
 ---Theodore Roosevelt, 1915

 "We should insist that if the immigrant who comes here does in good faith become an American and assimilates himself to us he shall be treated on an exact equality with every one else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed or birth-place or origin. But this is predicated upon the man's becoming in very fact an American and nothing but an American. If he tries to keep segregated with men of his own origin and separated from the rest of America, then he isn't doing his part as an American. There can be no divided allegiance here. We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language, for we intend to see that the crucible turns our people out as Americans, of American nationality, and not as dwellers in a polyglot boarding-house; and we have room for but one soul loyalty, and that is loyalty to the American people." 
---Theodore Roosevelt, 1919

Roosevelt saw the dangers of extreme multiculturalism undermining the American identity, even back then. Could you imagine what he would think today?

Could our nation be characterized as "dwellers in a polygot boarding house?" Unquestionably so.

Since when did immigration, legal or illegal, not include assimilation? The older I get and the more I actually observe the immigrant class, the more I realize that the immigrants we have coming to this country today in the 21st century are not the immigrants that came to America in droves in the early 20th century. There is a complete difference in ideology and philosophy between the two.

It is increasingly rare to find an immigrant who genuinely loves this country and wants to be an American first and foremost. Instead, the majority of immigrants choose to hold their allegiance to their native land, making no effort whatsoever to assimilate into the American culture.

Learn to bake apple pie. Try to watch baseball o fútbol Americano. Drive a Chevy. Learn about Thomas Jefferson and George Washington. Be proud to call yourself an American and honored to live in the greatest country on earth!

Instead, there are many who immigrate here with no intention of assimilating into the culture. America is simply a landmass, nothing more.

Perhaps I am a different breed. I can tell you, if I immigrated to any other country I would make a conscious effort to actively assimilate into that culture by learning the native language, adopting the customs, learning to appreciate that country's art and being happy and grateful to be a citizen of that nation. I can't imagine moving to Russia and refusing to learn Russian or flying a big fat patriotic American flag over my residence in Moscow. If I moved to another country and started a life there, I would proudly fly that nation's flag and be proud to call myself a citizen of that country, whether it is Canada, Spain, Argentina, or Sweden.

There are plenty of patriotic immigrants out there. From all nations. My time in the Army has allowed me to meet proud Americans of countless backgrounds: Korean, Indian, Mexican, and Iranian to name a few. They love America, which is why they chose to serve. Unfortunately these patriots are a dying breed.

The United States and the West are too tolerant. And immigrants know this. They know they can get away with it. Muslims are who I am referring to here and the European nations, primarily Britain, France, and Belgium are just now beginning to realize the destructive path they have started down. In Brussels, Muslims make up 25% of the total population, and segregate themselves into strict Islamic communities, such as "Little Morocco", which are governed by Shariah law and have no regard for the nation's rule of law. The same can be observed here in the United States, in places such as Dearborn, Michigan, which some have nicknamed "Dearbornistan".

It isn't just Muslims or those of Arab descent. There is an increasing number of immigrants of Hispanic origin who are beginning to identify with La Raza and the Mexica Movement in the American southwest. If you haven't heard of the Mexica Movement their mission statement goes something like this: "The United States stole land from Mexico and all European Americans should be deported to Europe and the American southwest given back to Mexico." This video pretty much sums it up...

These are extremists. But the basic ideology is widespread. No need to assimilate or better yet..."I am not an American." This is a problem and should be addressed. 

Primary mission: Beating Barack Obama

That should be first and foremost in every single American's mind. On the heels of Mitt Romney's 5 state sweep last night, moving him closer to the official nomination, it is evident there is a stark contrast in ideology among conservatives.

There are those who firmly believe a Mitt Romney presidency would be just as damaging, both short term and long term, as a second Obama term. I find this viewpoint utterly idiotic to be honest.

And there are those, like myself, who believe anything and everything should be done to help Mitt Romney challenge Obama. We acknowledge he isn't the perfect candidate, nor the perfect conservative. We live in an imperfect world and you have to work with what you have.

Liberty At Stake puts it perfectly in "We're All Mitten's Men Now".

"The point is, those of us in the conservative coalition need to get completely behind Romney, now that he is the sure GOP nominee, and do everything possible to help him defeat the Saul Alinsky radical in the White House. Any other position is fundamentally un-conservative. To be conservative is first and foremost to see the world as it is. Four more years of this inept and radical left wing governance from BHO and His Corrupt Gang of Progressiveswould be a complete disaster for the republic. Not casting a vote , or throwing away your vote on a quixotic 3rd party candidate, because Mittens isn’t the perfect conservative, is as good as voting for the Saul Alinsky radical. That’s how the system works. To be conservative is to understand when it is time to suck it up, hitch up the big boy pants, and cooperate to graduate. (Flag thrown for cliché abuse) This is such a time. "

However, there are still those on the right who simply won't support Romney. Even if it means giving Obama another term.

Every day, I take a stroll over to Ron Paul Cult Central, AKA The Daily Paul, partly because half of me still likes Ron Paul and partly because I find the comments and articles from Ron Paul supporters wildly and childishly entertaining. These people take pride in attacking Mitt Romney more than Barack Obama. And they firmly believe Ron Paul still will win. Despite the fact Ron Paul has received the least amount of votes and the least amount of delegates out of the remaining 4 GOP candidates, somehow he still has the best chance of winning the nomination and the general election. The millions of people who voted for Mitt Romney over the course of the primary season just dropped from the sky apparently. Take this for example:

"Let's keep the eye on the prize. We were not expected to do well in Romney territory. But, look at the numbers. We are only growing. The media is starting to recognize our movement. We are about Dr. Paul and we are about a movement. We are not giving up on Dr. Paul and we are not giving up on the movement. The convention in Tampa is one goal but not the only goal. We can still get Dr. Paul the nomination. Don't be fooled by the media. But, keep in mind this is a long "slog" and we are laying the foundation for the future are well. Keep it up everyone. Lick your wounds from yesterday but keep it up and take pride in the work we are doing. Now, stop the chatter, get phone banking, get canvassing, get donating, get going. Go Ron Paul."

The denial and fantasy world they live in over there borders on 2008 Obamabot "free gas/mortgage" insanity. Just remember, there is a conspiracy to silence Ron Paul and he has actually won each state. In Tampa everyone will catch Paulbot Jew-hate hippie fever and be instantly overcome with Ron Paul rainbow flowerpower as he rides a powerful wave of momentum all the way to the White House....

Meanwhile, myself and the rest of those grounded in reality will get behind Romney. Why? Not because we like Romney. Not because we desire a Romney presidency. And not because it is what "The Republicans have told us to do." We will be voting with our conscience too. Our consciences tell us that Obama must be defeated.

Personally, I would prefer that the Judicial Branch not be overrun by radical left Obama appointees for the next 20-30 years. Would you prefer an ultra left supermajority on the Supreme Court?

Barack Obama is no ordinary Democrat. Barack Obama is a radical quasi-Marxist who has been bred from early childhood to hate the colonialism of the United States and the Western nations, the unfairness of capitalism and the free market system, and the "prejudice" of an American society run by white men. This is who Obama is. His arrogance and disdain for America far exceeds that of traditional Democrats like John Kerry or the late Ted Kennedy.

I am a conservative who is in tune with reality. Mitt Romney is our best chance to dethrone Barack Obama and I will fight for him to win with every last breath I have up until election day.

Now that's justice for Trayvon! Black mob beats white man nearly to death.

Man Beaten By Mob, In Critical Condition

According to police, Owens fussed at some kids playing basketball in the middle of Delmar Drive about 8:30 Saturday night. They say the kids left and a group of adults returned, armed with everything but the kitchen sink. Police tell News 5 the suspects used chairs, pipes and paint cans to beat Owens. Owens' sister, Ashley Parker, saw the attack. "It was the scariest thing I have ever witnessed." Parker says 20 people, all African American, attacked her brother on the front porch of his home, using "brass buckles, paint cans and anything they could get their hands on." Police will only say "multiple people" are involved. What Parker says happened next could make the fallout from the brutal beating even worse. As the attackers walked away, leaving Owen bleeding on the ground, Parker says one of them said "Now thats justice for Trayvon."

I hope Trayvon Martin's family, including his money grubbing mother who wants to make money off her dead son, race baiters Al Sharpton, Jesse Hijackson, Eric Holder, The Black Panthers, Barack Obama and every other black supremacist in this country is happy. Instead of urban blacks killing themselves, now they are targeting white people. Bravo to all those mentioned above. They called for more blood and they got it.

To those in the inner cities of all colors, black, white, tan, red, purple....I urge you to either A) move to an area where packs of wild savages like the people who attacked this man don't live or B) purchase a firearm and be ready to defend yourself.

The race riots will come and it will only get worse.

Cult behavior intermingles with politics.

Characteristics associated with cultic groups

Before reading these characteristics, I'd like you to think of what current political leaders and followers, in either party, qualify.

The group displays excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader and (whether he is alive or dead) regards his belief system, ideology, and practices as the Truth, as law. ‪

Questioning, doubt, and dissent are discouraged or even punished. ‪ Mind-altering practices (such as meditation, chanting, speaking in tongues, denunciation sessions, and debilitating work routines) are used in excess and serve to suppress doubts about the group and its leader(s). ‪

The leadership dictates, sometimes in great detail, how members should think, act, and feel (for example, members must get permission to date, change jobs, marry—or leaders prescribe what types of clothes to wear, where to live, whether or not to have children, how to discipline children, and so forth). ‪

The group is elitist, claiming a special, exalted status for itself, its leader(s) and members (for example, the leader is considered the Messiah, a special being, an avatar—or the group and/or the leader is on a special mission to save humanity). ‪

The group has a polarized us-versus-them mentality, which may cause conflict with the wider society. ‪ The leader is not accountable to any authorities (unlike, for example, teachers, military commanders or ministers, priests, monks, and rabbis of mainstream religious denominations). ‪

The group teaches or implies that its supposedly exalted ends justify whatever means it deems necessary. This may result in members' participating in behaviors or activities they would have considered reprehensible or unethical before joining the group (for example, lying to family or friends, or collecting money for bogus charities). ‪

The leadership induces feelings of shame and/or guilt in order to influence and/or control members. Often, this is done through peer pressure and subtle forms of persuasion. ‪

Subservience to the leader or group requires members to cut ties with family and friends, and radically alter the personal goals and activities they had before joining the group. ‪

The group is preoccupied with bringing in new members. ‪

The group is preoccupied with making money. ‪ Members are expected to devote inordinate amounts of time to the group and group-related activities. ‪

Members are encouraged or required to live and/or socialize only with other group members. ‪ The most loyal members (the “true believers”) feel there can be no life outside the context of the group.

They believe there is no other way to be, and often fear reprisals to themselves or others if they leave (or even consider leaving) the group.


Well, who did you come up with? 

How Mia Love dismantles the liberals' racism/sexism argument.

Recently we have learned that conservative Republican Mia Love has won the nomination for Utah's newly created 4th Congressional District. The heads of liberals from coast to coast have exploded in sheer amazement. How could racist, women hating Republicans vote for a black woman? (I guess for the same reasons they voted for Herman Cain, Tim Scott, Charles Lollar, and Allen West...)

If this nomination of Mia Love in Utah isn't enough to dash the ill conceived notions of liberals and Obama supporters I don't know what is.

Some things to consider:

Utah is widely regarded as one of the most red states in the nation. Last year, Business Insider listed Utah as the 5th most conservative state in the nation, with Gallup polling data to back it up. Provo, Utah is consistently ranked as the most conservative city in the nation.

Utah has the 7th lowest population of African Americans per 100 citizens at 0.77. Over 80% of the population is white and less than 1% black.

The newly mapped 4th district Mia Love is running in contains the cities of Nephi, Payson, West Valley City, West Jordan, and Sandy.

Nephi: 5389 residents. 97% white.
Payson: 18294 residents. 94% white.
West Valley City: 129480 residents. 65% white. 33% hispanic.
West Jordan: 103712 residents. 89% white. 10% hispanic.
Sandy: 87461 residents. 93% white. 4% hispanic.

The highest percentage of African Americans is 1.96%, in West Valley City.

The two counties in Utah that the 4th district covers are Salt Lake and Utah counties with McCain getting 48% and 78% of the vote respectively in 2008. However, Salt Lake county includes Salt Lake City, which isn't within the 4th district. Even then, Obama won the county in 2008 by just 296 votes, out of 353680 total votes. Extremely conservative for a major city. In 2004, Salt Lake county voted for Bush by 60% and Utah county by 86%.

What can we learn from all this? That Utah's 4th district is extremely conservative and extremely white.

Yet they nominate a black woman to represent them. Mia Love and the intentions of voters in Utah's 4th Congressional District prove that the wild accusations of racism and sexism by those on the left towards the right are completely baseless.

Nice try libs. 

Feminists attack LEGO for marketing toys for girls.

It's always a lose lose with feminazis. Exclude them and they'll scream "oppression". Include them and they'll fabricate a bogus claim that girls are being prodded by society from an early age to be.........GIRLS! The horror!

"They have little breasts and they have fancy hair," the organization's executive director, Dana Edell, told FoxNews.com. "And it just disturbs us that this is the image that they want girls to see." Edell also objects to what she calls stereotyping of preferred pastimes for girls. "What it's doing is telling girls that this is what's important to you," Edell said of the beauty parlor and hot tub sets. "Girls aren't building space shuttles, they're getting their nails done."

Would you rather they have huge arms, beards, and working construction?

This is the same psychopathic phobia that causes ultra relativist liberals in Sweden to test their idiot social experiments on pre-schoolers in a special "gender neutral school".  It is also the same disorder (and I'm putting that lightly) that drives a Canadian couple to raise their child in a "gender neutral" environment, free from "social constraints". A couple in Sweden also did this, and I'm sure there are many more around the world in enlightened hotspots of liberal enlightenment where up = down, right = wrong, and there is really no definition to anything at all, except what you make of it.

Boys and girls are genetically wired to be drawn to different things. It is how we grow up to be men and women, with unique characteristics, desires, and views of life. There are many liberals, and extreme feminists particularly, who simply do not understand the ways of the world and what is normal and what is not normal. They want men and women to be equal, not only in sensible matters such as suffrage and work pay, but also physically, mentally, and spiritually to a degree so extreme, that there no longer are any definitive characteristics of male and female and the concepts of femininity and masculinity are things of the past. 

This relativist ideology dominates thinking on the left, in every nation. 

Ron Paul Supporter Quote of the Day: "I also will vote for Obama."

More insanity from the Ron Paul cult. I now wonder if the percentage of true conservative Ron Paul supporters who care about this country is 2% or 1%. Maybe even less.


"Yes, I will also vote for Obama. It's to show the GOP the same respect they've given Ron Paul in this election. I'm not the only one. I used to believe in voting with my conscience, but, the system is a joke, so might as well treat it as such."

America's poor: Not so poor.

Is our country really that poor? I don't think so.

The moment those in poverty sell their television, their personal computer, their cell phone, their Air Jordans, their silver watches, gold chains, and 22s then I might consider that person to be in a state of relative poverty.

The United States is the only nation on earth where "poor" people can still afford a decent sized house/apartment, a computer and monthly internet service, a TV, a cell phone, expensive shoes, a car, lottery tickets, cigarettes, and routine weekend escapades to the clubs and bars downtown.

These are the same people who are "struggling to put food on the table" and desperately in need of government assistance.

Don't tell me you're poor because you can't afford to go to the club this weekend. And don't tell me our government needs to "tax the rich" so you can indulge yourself some more on the taxpayer dime.

The moment I see a homeless person with basketball shoes or a basketball jersey, a watch, nice jeans, and a cell phone, I lose any and all sympathy I might have had for them. Likewise, I have no sympathy for the "struggling" lower class in America who somehow doesn't have enough money to put food on the table but has plenty of money for non-necessities.

The American standard of living far exceeds that of the rest of the world, and our warped perception of "poverty" is a testament to this. Anyone who has traveled to a 3rd world country can attest.

Along similar lines,  the poverty stricken "victims" of this unfair, cruel, and inherently racist society also seem to be able to afford Obama 2012 bumper stickers in droves for their low riding Cadillacs and Lincolns.

Give me a break. 

Anti Obama Ammunition for 2012.

Americans for Prosperity makes great videos. Here are a few of their best on Solyndra...






ShePac's effective "Million Dollar Man" video...



Here is the RNC's most popular video and probably the most effective.



And another from the RNC...



American Crossroads is also a good source of anti-Obama videos. Their best in my opinion...



On Operation Fast and Furious, the NRA has provided us this comprehensive video...



IlluminatiTV did a video on Barack Obama's support of partial birth abortion back in 2008. I think the video is still relevant in 2012...



10000Pennies has put out some of the very best easy to understand videos for those who might not follow politics as much...



(I highly recommend 10000Pennies videos. They are entertaining and easy to understand. These are definitely the videos you want to share on Facebook or other social media.)


Glenn Beck put out this video in response to Obama's Tom Hanks propaganda piece, The Road We've Traveled...



On a humorous note, here's this one from the NRSC...



A lot of propaganda, but propaganda we need, because the other side will be churning out Soros funded propaganda videos left and right this year.

Have any other favorite videos to share with friends who might not be as politically active? Feel free to share and I'll add them to the list.