Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Liberals falsely impersonating Hack Wilson on comment threads.

I am oh so flattered! It looks like I have made an impression on the left wing wackos trolling the internet with my meager blog. In my statistics today I see many have visited Hack Wilson via this link, a liberal blog where some vile left winger decided it would be nice to write a nasty comment supporting our soldiers killing civilians, under my name and with a link to my blog.

Hackwilsonblog

Unless he's killing Americans, this guy did nothing wrong. It's war, Liberals! Get your heads out of your parents basements and realize the world ain't made of pot and candybars. As a vet, I know soldiers are under a lot of stress. Yeah because they're getting shot at by people who don't want them there! This guy needs a psychiatrist but not jail time. Obama would rather jail an American than hurt a damn Muslim.

http://www.hackwilson.blogspot.com
(UPDATE: Moderator has deleted original link and changed name of commentor to "Hack" after I replied as "Hack". Haha, this keeps getting better.)

Once again, I am honored to be so feared by the leftists that they feel it necessary to impersonate me on the internet.

(By the way, I don't support the killing of civilians, Muslim or otherwise. Nice try though.)

In similar news, another liberal (this one civil) posted an open letter to Hack Wilson and White America in response to my postings about Derrick Bell. A full response will be published tomorrow.

I am going to celebrate tonight!

BRAVO liberals!

Monday, March 12, 2012

The Kony 2012 Phenomenon- Give me a break.

Lately, chances are you've been bombarded with the "Kony 2012" video, either on your Facebook page, in your email account, on Twitter, or whatever dark corner of the internet you frequent.

All I gotta say is....give me a break.

"Spread awareness about Joseph Kony!"

"STOP Joseph Kony! Repost!"

"Join the revolution and make Kony famous! Let's stop him!"


This is the work of clueless college kids who want to feel good about themselves. They think if they repost a video and send a link to their other clueless college buddies in cyberspace about something going on in Africa they have no idea about (and never knew about before) that now they are a good person. I bet not one of them will actually pack up and go to Africa to help fight the LRA. Nor will they donate any significant amount of money. Nor will they sacrifice any of their precious time for the cause...except the 3 seconds it took to repost the video of course.

I knew about Joseph Kony before this whole viral video campaign infested the internet. I knew his atrocities. I knew about the LRA. I knew that US special forces were present in Africa supporting the fight against him. This isn't anything new! Good grief.

Everyone wants to make a difference and be a part of something meaningful. But no one ever actually does anything about it that might require actual sacrifice. I guess that is the real pet peeve here. The youthful masses in cyber space are so proud of themselves for being a part of the "revolution" to stop Joseph Kony! And just how do you become part of the "revolution"?

1) Find reposted link to Kony 2012 video on your Facebook page.
2) Repost link to Kony 2012 video on your Facebook page.
3) Give yourself a pat on the back and remind yourself how good of a person you are.
4) Forget all about Joseph Kony and the LRA 2 hours later.


Military recruitment ads

I saw a recent ad for the US Marines and I thought to myself, "these guys know how to advertise."

Here is the latest Marines commercial...


And here is another powerful ad...



But this has to be my all time favorite...




Yes the Devildogs really know how to sell. Can't say the same about my branch!



Navy


And here is a really cool video put out by the British Army...



I can hear all the libtards and Alex Jones-tards now: "Lies! Propaganda! Warmongering! Evil pawns for the new world order!"

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Marxist Influences: Barack Obama's childhood and adolescence.

In this post I will cover the manner in which Barack "Barry" Obama was raised from childhood on. I understand the ignorant liberal, or indifferent everyday American, may view this information as pointless. To that I would say, grow up a little bit more. I am not going to waste my breath drawing crayon pictures for you explaining the principle behind the idiom "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree."

Who were some of the central figures in Barack Obama's youth?

Stanley Ann Dunham (MOTHER)- Barack Obama said of his mother, "She was the dominant figure in my formative years ... The values she taught me continue to be my touchstone when it comes to how I go about the world of politics." Interesting stuff. It isn't surprising though, how Ann Dunham's worldview rubbed off on her son Barack. Ann's first radical progressive influences came in late junior high at Mercer Island High School in Washington state. There she adopted the principles taught by teachers Val Foubert and Jim Wichterman who pushed an anti-authoritarian, anti-religion, progressive worldview on their young students. (the hallway between the two classrooms was dubbed 'anarchist alley'.) The teachers regularly caused protest from parents, by forcing students to read the Communist Manifesto and HL Mencken, Karl Marx and the pro homosexual writings of Margaret Mead. Ann blossomed. Former classmates remember Dunham as "ahead of her time, in an off center way" and "the original feminist." Barack Obama's mother held deep convictions about religion and politics throughout her whole life. She was adamantly opposed to religion, even being described by Obama himself as "a lonely witness for secular humanism." Former classmate Maxine Box said of young Ann, "She touted herself as an atheist, and it was something she'd read about and could argue." While in college, Ann met Obama Sr. in a "Russian language" class. Interesting. Her dissertation was a Marxist interpretation of peasant workers in Indonesia. She routinely questioned Capitalism and Democracy and would ask, "What's so bad about Communism?" Needless to say, Stanley Ann Dunham was an extreme far leftist with a sweet tooth for Communist philosophy, and an utter disdain for religion.

Barack Obama Sr. (FATHER)- Raised a Muslim, Barack Obama Sr. regarded himself an atheist before ever meeting Ann Dunham in Hawaii. He had 3 other wives and seven other children aside from Ann and Barack Jr. He didn't tell her he was still married to a woman in Kenya when they married in Hawaii in 1961. 2 years prior, he wrote an article in Kenya called "The Problems Facing Our Socialism", which one could argue exhibit a certain degree of Communism, if not far left leanings. Barack Obama Sr. studied economics at Harvard. He continued his education while Ann raised Barack Jr., not seeing him until 1971, when he visited Ann and Barack in Hawaii for a month. Barack Obama Sr. was bright, though a womanizer, non existent father, and eventual alcoholic.

Stanley Dunham (MATERNAL GRANDFATHER)- Described as boisterous, outgoing, and sometimes out of touch, Barack Obama's maternal grandfather, with whom he lived much of his childhood in Hawaii, was also a Communist sympathizer. During the late 1950s, while living in Mercer Island, Washington, The Dunhams attended East Shore Unitarian Church. Also known as "The Little Red Church on the Hill", it taught a liberal theology and embraced Communism. After the family moved to Hawaii, Stanley befriended one Frank Marshall Davis, known Communist, anti-Christian poet. A friendship developed between the two which eventually led to Davis being introduced to the young Barack Obama. Obama later writes in 'Dreams from my Father' about a man named "Frank" (he never mentioned his last name) who would come to the house, read poetry, drink whiskey, and smoke marijuana with Stanley Dunham. Barack would often sit in and listen. In 1997, the FBI destroyed their file on Stanley Dunham, indicating he posed at least some risk to national security in years past.

Frank Marshall Davis (FRIEND AND MENTOR)- In Dreams from My Father Barack Obama describes his  relationship with Davis during the 1970s while living in Hawaii. He describes him as a "mentor", and one he could always look to for answers. Obama's half sister Maya Soetoro-Ng also speaks how her grandfather, Stanley Dunham viewed Davis as a "point of connection" for Barack. Davis was an active member of CPUSA (Communist Party of the USA). CPUSA contributing editor Gerald Thorne says, "Davis was a decisive influence in helping Obama to find his present identity". Davis was a poet whose themes included anti-American rhetoric, pro-Soviet Union rhetoric, black nationalism, and insults against Jesus and Christians. One poem called "Christ is a Dixie Nigger" describes Jesus as another "new white hope." Another praises the Soviet Red Army. Davis was also the author of a book called Sex Rebel, where he details his sexual exploits in the most pornographic of terms, including bisexuality, sado-masochism, orgies, and encounters with 13 year old girls. Davis, the mentor of the young Barack Obama, was a staunch Communist, hater of Christians, drug dealer, and a complete pervert.

Evie/Turdi (NANNY IN INDONESIA)- Just recently information has been discovered of a man/woman who cared for Barack Obama during is early childhood in Indonesia. Between the ages of 6 and 10, Barack Obama was put in the care of "Evie", a transgender, who was born a man and is now a "woman". Evie recalls making Barack laugh when he would put on his mother's lipstick, but always trying to "appear manly" in front of Barack, and not wear any women's clothes. Evie now works as a prostitute in Jakarta.


Is it any wonder why Barack Obama blossomed into the confused, Marxist that he is? Born and raised into the ideologies of Communism from day one, there is no doubt that these tendencies translated into early adulthood and on. Like prerequisites to more advanced classes, the indoctrination by his mother, grandfather, and Frank Marshall Davis in his early years planted a deep seed inside Barack Obama from a young age that would cultivate and stimulate his yearning for higher degrees of radicalism. Jeremiah Wright. Bill Ayers. Bernardene Dohrn. Derrick Bell. Rashid Khalidi.

Maybe one day the majority of the American public, Democrat and Republican, Liberal and Conservative, Atheist, Christian, Gay, Straight, will finally understand just who Barack Hussein Obama really is.

Saturday, March 10, 2012

So you want to vote for Barack Obama?

You mean the guy that wants to find ways to lower gas prices by studying algae and inflating our tires, instead of drilling for oil on our own land?

You mean the guy that voted to ban all handguns in the state of Illinois?

You mean the guy that appointed an advocate for vivid, graphic homosexual education in elementary schools to the position of "safe schools czar"?

You mean the guy that said sex education for kindergartners is "the right thing to do"?

You mean the guy that apologized to infuriated Afghan Muslims for Q'uran burnings after they murdered US troops? (and before they murdered more US troops.)

You mean the guy that has added more debt to the United States in 3 years than all other US presidents from Washington to Bush jr. combined?

You mean the guy that adamantly supports the abhorrent practice of partial birth abortion?

You mean the guy that said we should open up our hearts and minds to the words of a man who believes the Civil Rights Movement was pointless and that all white people are inherently racist?

You mean the guy that started his political career in the home of a terrorist?

You mean the guy that campaigned on the promise of complete transparency, yet has an administration chock full of lobbyists?

You mean the guy that said he sides with Occupy Wall Street?

You mean the guy that conducted his first interview as president with al-Arabiya, apologizing to the Muslim world for all the wrongs America has done to them?

You mean the guy whose administration sold deadly weapons to Mexican drug cartels in Operation Fast and Furious, which ended up being used to murder American border patrol agents?

You mean the guy that still hasn't apologized to the families of the dead border patrol agents or offered an explanation on Operation Fast and Furious, yet deems it necessary to offer words of encouragement to Sandra Fluke and terrorists overseas who murdered American soldiers?

You mean the guy who loaned 535 million dollars in taxpayer money to Solyndra (who donated heavily to the Obama campaign in 2008) only to see them go bankrupt and the money simply vanish? (much of it to lobbyists)

You mean the guy that rammed through the most controversial and divisive piece of legislation in American history through corrupt backroom deals?

You mean the guy that ridicules Republicans and others who wish to achieve energy independence from the Middle East by drilling for our own oil?

You mean the guy that submissively bows to foreign leaders?

You mean the guy that became the first president in American history to oversee the US credit rating get downgraded?

You mean the guy that accepts SuperPac money from a vulgar, vile, comedian who routinely degrades and demeans women?

You mean the guy who wants to impose his unconstitutional birth control mandate upon religious institutions against their will and against their beliefs?

You mean the guy that launched a war in Libya, without Congressional approval, and exceeding the 90 day War Powers Act limit?

You mean the guy who was an outspoken Marxist radical in college according to fellow Marxist radicals who were with him?

You mean the guy who openly admits rabid anti-Christian, anti-American Communist Frank Marshall Davis was his childhood mentor?

You mean the guy who openly admits anti-American, black supremacist Jeremiah Wright is his spiritual mentor?

You mean the guy who openly admits radical race baiters and anti-American professors Derrick Bell and Charles Ogletree as his academic mentors?

You mean the guy that said the Constitution is flawed because it contains no provisions for redistribution of wealth?

You mean the guy that supported and funded a known terrorist and his group, with the help of a former terrorist?


This list is only the tip of the iceberg.

Twit-ter

Every day it seems, I read about another celebrity, pro athlete, politician, or media personality who has exceeded the bounds of professionalism and human intelligence by posting something asinine on Twitter.

The latest casualty in the Stupid War is Cher. Michelle Malkin brings this idiocy to light on her new website, Twitchy.com, highlighting all the bogus idiocy, child like rants, misspellings and grammatical errors from today's most popular people on Twitter.

Adolescent irrationality and emotion seem to explode from Cher's underdeveloped brain to her keyboard where she "tweets" some of the most unbelievably infantile, misled, and emotionally charged cow dung to ever grace the Twitosphere.

"Don't believe in the Right wing's effort to Subjugate women! WHO R THESE MEN WHO THINK THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO TAKE WOMEN BACK TO THE STONE


---


AGE ! We talk about how radical Muslims take away the Rights of their woman, but HOW CAN WE LET These RW Misogynistic Cretins take away


---


Our BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS ! IF THIS Was Happening in another Country Woman Across The USA Would B outraged ! Well Girls wake up & Smell the


---


Coffee,you're in another Country! U young women don't realize what NO FREEDOM FEELS LIKE! WITHOUT FREEDOM YOU HAVE NOTHING !


---


Every minority has had to fight for their civil Rights,i thought we won the rights to our OWN Bodies in the 60's...SILLY ME! Im so furious


---


HURT, OUTRAGED ! How do a bunch of old white political extremists get to do this 2 us? God North Korea has higher favorable #'s than they Do


---


Get a fkn Dictionary ! RT @MilkKnNnHoneYy @cherI don't understand a fckn word! :D


---


Why? Passion is what is needed when a crime is being committed against our sisters RT @EliseTheLovely@political rant is scaring me!!


---


Ok ill sit down,shut my mouth, calm down,stop being passionate! Im not Ranting Im WARNING!Out Of Everyone I THOUGHT U would Understand? :-(





Wow. What ever happened to professionalism and maturity? And this isn't strictly Cher or politics. This type of behavior can be seen all across the spectrum of stardom. Pro athletes. Media tycoons. Politicians. Hollywood elite.

The internet has become the perfect tool for disconnect. How much easier it now is to vent, rant, attack, insult, and degrade from behind a computer screen than to actually say these words to someone's real 3D face. I admit I am guilty of this, and I think anyone else is who has ever visited Youtube.com, Facebook.com, Yahoo.com, or any other online public forum is guilty as well.

Twit-ter, however, takes this immaturity to a whole new level. Now, we can actually get news stories of controversial statements made by public figures because the public figures actually release it themselves. Smart, to a degree, if you want free publicity. But on Cher's part, and countless other celebrities, (who force one to wonder if they ever completed 4th grade spelling) their utter stupidity, proliferated by their very own doing, is plain as day for all to see.

What a world we live in.

Friday, March 9, 2012

Professor Derrick Bell says he "lives to harass white people." So where's the controversy?

This just gets better and better, doesn't it?



Professor Derrick Bell, the man young Barack Hussein Obama told us to "open up our hearts and minds" to so many years ago is not the bombshell. Nor is the above clip, though certainly inflammatory.

Derrick Bell is yet another piece in the gigantic puzzle that is Barack Obama. A puzzle that also includes pieces called Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, Rashid Khalidi, and countless others. This gigantic puzzle is the bombshell, as we will find out over the course of the year. Piece by piece. As the late Breitbart is being ridiculed now by the mainstream media for the so called "dud" released days ago, it will happen again and again as new pieces about Barack Obama surface.

They will continue to scream, "Where's the controversy?!"

The Civil Rights Movement was pointless and futile. Where's the controversy?
White supremacy is the order of the day. Where's the controversy?
Black Americans will never achieve liberty in America. Where's the controversy?
The Space Traders. Where's the controversy?
I live to harass white people. Where's the controversy?


Fact: Derrick Bell's life, study, and theory was completely 100% predicated on one thing and one thing only- the unchanging characteristic of white supremacy existent in all white people.

The left can ignore these truths all they want. What they can't do is stop the Breitbart machine, with the help of an army of independent conservative journalists, from churning out this information as the year progresses. Then the people can decide.

And don't forget, there is one hugely powerful mechanism that is on our side. This mechanism attracts more viewers than all the major liberal networks combined. This mechanism is #2 in news link traffic behind Google. This mechanism is the Drudge Report. That has to count for something.


Bill Maher: Obama's Million Dollar Man (VIDEO)



ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, HuffPo, NY Times, PBS....We'll play your game!

REPOST this video.

Occupy Wall Street will hurt Obama in the general election.

This is one part of the big political mess of 2012 that I believe many on both sides have overlooked. Occupy Wall Street; that rag tag band of disheveled, Robin Hood wannabes, who hate Capitalism. They will be out in full force this spring and summer and are also planning on making a loud appearance at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, like a screaming, whining child tugging on his mommy's shirt in the grocery store yelling "I want candy!".

Public opinion polling late last year (before the Occupiers went into hibernation) indicates an overall distaste for the movement. This is most likely due to the thousands of arrests, violence, nude dancing, hate crimes, defecation in public, rapes, and overtaking of public businesses. I think it has to do with the overall anti-Capitalist, "dirty hippie" aura in general.

Other than the left wing, anti-authority college crowd, the majority of Americans are turned off to the Occupiers. How does this factor in to the election?

As already pointed out, The Occupy Wall Street movement is already planning for a major spring and summer offensive. As the weather heats up, so too will the protests. And these raucous, violent, Proletariats will be plastered all over the left wing media. In a bout of hilarious irony, the liberal media will actually do the opposite of their intentions, as we saw late last year. The more media coverage, the better. So all of America can see the despicable behavior of the left. It will be on their TVs. It will be in their newspapers. It will be on the Drudge Report and CNN and ABC. In an effort by the reporters liberal activists within the mainstream media to strengthen the Occupy Wall Street movement by bringing their cause into every American home, they will only expedite its demise. I find this hilarious.

These flag bearers of the far left will only serve to hurt the perception of liberals and Democrats over the course of this year through their continual violence, immaturity, and anarchist behavior. What's better, Barack Obama has already openly declared his support for Occupy, saying, "We are on their side."  Want a smoking gun? There you have it. I can think of no other more powerful piece of ammunition to use in the campaign against Barack Obama. (that the general American public will recognize anyway)

So as the toils of the 2012 political season press on, just wait. Wait for the hippies to crawl back out from under their pink rocks, so they can start screaming, and whining, and complaining about rich people again. And you can bet they will focus their anger towards the Republican candidate, whoever that will be. Even better.

Related: Tea Party vs. Occupy Wall Street

Thursday, March 8, 2012

CNN news anchor Soledad O'Brien vs. Breitbart's Joel Pollack on Obama/Bell video

Today, Breitbart.com's Joel Pollack went on CNN to discuss the recently released video of Barack Obama embracing Professor Derrick Bell at Harvard in 1991.

The exchange between host Soledad O'Brien and Joel Pollack is truly awesome. O'Brien ranted, raved, and looked like she was about to have a nervous breakdown while Pollack remained cool, civil, and on point the entire time. O'Brien demonstrated Pollack's (and Breitbart's) point perfectly, beautifully, and coherently: that the mainstream media refuses to objectively report and instead defends Barack Obama.

By the end of the exchange, any non biased viewer with ears and eyeballs would certainly see that Joel Pollack, as well as GBTV's Amy Holmes, were the voices of reason here. They made the liberal talking heads at CNN look like complete fools.



This is genius Breitbart. This is exactly what these Breitbart videos are meant to do. Elicit a frothing at the mouth reaction from the liberals and the mainstream media so the whole country can see who the real voice of reason is. Great job Joel and Amy. 

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Who is Professor Derrick Bell and what is Critical Race Theory?

The newly released video of a young, blossoming Marxist Barak Hussein Obama shows the future president praising Professor Derrick Bell at Harvard. Like I posted earlier, The Conservative Lady has already done a superb job of jumping on this.




So who is Derrick Bell?

The founder of Critical Race Theory. We will get to that in a moment.

First, I'll let you read for yourself...

(from Wikipedia)

Protests over faculty diversity
In 1980 Bell became the dean of the University of Oregon School of Law, becoming one of the first African-Americans to ever head a non-black law school. He resigned in 1985 over a dispute about faculty diversity.[1] Bell then taught at Stanford University for a year.


Returning to Harvard in 1986, Bell staged a five-day sit-in in his office to protest the school's failure to grant tenure to two legal scholars on staff, both of whom adhered to a movement in legal philosophy that claims legal institutions play a role in the maintenance of the ruling class' position. The administration, not giving an inch, claimed substandard scholarship and teaching on the part of the professors as the reason for the denial of tenure, but Bell called it an unambiguous attack on ideology. Bell's sit-in galvanized student support but sharply divided the faculty.[3]


Bell reentered the debate over hiring practices at Harvard in 1990, when he vowed to take an unpaid leave of absence until the school appointed a female of color to its tenured faculty.[4] At the time, of the law school's 60 tenured professors, only three were black and five were women. The school had never had a black woman on the tenured staff.[3]


Students held vigils and protests in solidarity with Bell with the support of some faculty. One of these students was future U.S. president Barack Obama, who spoke at a protest at Harvard Law School on behalf of Bell.[5] Critics, including some faculty members, called Bell's methods counterproductive, and Harvard administration officials insisted they had already made enormous advances in hiring.[3] The story of his protest is detailed in his book Confronting Authority.

Academic contributions
Bell continued writing about critical race theory after accepting a teaching position at Harvard University. Much of his legal scholarship was influenced by his experience both as a black man and as a civil rights attorney. Writing in a narrative style, Bell contributed to the intellectual discussions on race. According to Bell, his purpose in writing was to examine the racial issues within the context of their economic and social and political dimensions from a legal standpoint.

For instance, in The Constitutional Contradiction, Bell argued that the framers of the Constitution chose the rewards of property over justice. With regard to the interest convergence, he maintains that "whites will promote racial advances for blacks only when they also promote white self-interest." Finally, in The Price of Racial Remedies, Bell argues that whites will not support civil rights policies that may threaten white social status, like the affirmative action hiring through which he acquired his status.

Get this:
In the mid-1960s Bell was appointed to the law faculty of the University of Southern California as executive director of the Western Center on Law and Poverty. In 1969, with the help of protests from black Harvard Law School students for a minority faculty member, Bell was hired to teach there. At Harvard, Bell established a new course in civil rights law, published a celebrated case book, Race, Racism and American Law, and produced a steady stream of law review articles. As a teacher, Bell became a mentor and role model to a generation of students of color, but he played a delicate balancing act at the university. Bell became the first black tenured professor in Harvard Law School's history and called on the university to improve its minority hiring record. But shortly after his tenure in 1971, a white university vice-president tried to purchase a house that Bell had been previously offered through the university; Bell saw this as a case of discrimination. This was the first case in which Bell's charges of racism would mobilize his supporters, who championed his efforts to stand up for principle, and anger his detractors, who accused him of being too quick with his allegations of bigotry.[3]

On Critical Race Theory:
Overall Theory
Although no set of canonical doctrines or methodologies defines CRT, the movement is loosely unified by two common areas of inquiry. First, CRT has analyzed the way in which white supremacy and racial power are reproduced over time, and in particular, the role that law plays in this process. Second, CRT work has investigated the possibility of transforming the relationship between law and racial power, and more broadly, the possibility of achieving racial emancipation and anti-subordination.

Key theoretical elements
-A critique of liberalism: CRT scholars favor a more aggressive approach to social transformation as opposed to liberalism's more cautious approach, favor a race conscious approach to transformation rather than liberalism's embrace of color blindness, and favor an approach that relies more on political organizing, in contrast to liberalism's reliance on rights-based remedies.
-Storytelling/counterstorytelling and "naming one's own reality"--using narrative to illuminate and explore experiences of racial oppression.
-Revisionist interpretations of American civil rights law and progress—criticizing civil rights scholarship and anti-discrimination law.
-Applying insights from social science writing on race and racism to legal problems.
-Structural determinism, or how "the structure of legal thought or culture influences its content."
-The intersections of race, sex, and class--e.g., how poor Latinas' experience of domestic violence needs distinctive remedies.
-Essentialism and anti-essentialism—reducing the experience of a category (like gender or race) to the experience of one sub-group (like white women or African-Americans).
-Cultural nationalism/separatism, Black nationalism--exploring more radical views arguing for separation and reparations as a form of foreign aid.
-Legal institutions, critical pedagogy, and minority lawyers in the bar.

CRITICISM
Many mainstream legal scholars have criticized CRT on a number of grounds, including some scholars' use of narrative and storytelling, as well as the critique of objectivity adopted by critical race theorists in connection with the critique of merit. Daniel Farber and Suzanna Sherry have argued that critical race theory, along with critical feminism and critical legal studies, has anti-Semitic and anti-Asian implications, has worked to undermine notions of democratic community and has impeded dialogue.[7] Judge Richard Posner of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago has “label[ed] critical race theorists and postmodernists the ‘lunatic core’ of ‘radical legal egalitarianism.’”[8] He writes,

What is most arresting about critical race theory is that...it turns its back on the Western tradition of rational inquiry, forswearing analysis for narrative. Rather than marshal logical arguments and empirical data, critical race theorists tell stories — fictional, science-fictional, quasi-fictional, autobiographical, anecdotal — designed to expose the pervasive and debilitating racism of America today. By repudiating reasoned argumentation, the storytellers reinforce stereotypes about the intellectual capacities of nonwhites.[8]

Judge Alex Kozinski, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, writes that Critical Race Theorists have constructed a philosophy which makes a valid exchange of ideas between the various disciplines unattainable.


The radical multiculturalists' views raise insuperable barriers to mutual understanding. Consider the Space Traders story. How does one have a meaningful dialogue with Derrick Bell? Because his thesis is utterly untestable, one quickly reaches a dead end after either accepting or rejecting his assertion that white Americans would cheerfully sell all blacks to the aliens. The story is also a poke in the eye of American Jews, particularly those who risked life and limb by actively participating in the civil rights protests of the 1960s. Bell clearly implies that this was done out of tawdry self-interest. Perhaps most galling is Bell's insensitivity in making the symbol of Jewish hypocrisy the little girl who perished in the Holocaust — as close to a saint as Jews have. A Jewish professor who invoked the name of Rosa Parks so derisively would be bitterly condemned — and rightly so.[9]

So what is Critical Race Theory in a nutshell? Heck, I didn't even have to do any work but copy and paste. This is utter hatred for anyone with fair skin. And there is our president standing there, praising the movement's founder.

At the left wing RacismReview.com this was said of Bell:

It is standard practice of scholars to honor their intellectual fore-parents who have been caste into the shadows of history, we eulogize their memories and praise their life’s work as a goal to which we should all aspire, but Derrick Bell’s life is the stuff “Black thought” is made of and resists such “fluffy-ization.” Derrick’s courage rang with the testament of Black thinkers from beginning to end. When I dared to suggest back in October of 2007 that philosophers were trying to make sense of his work next to Marx and Nietzsche, he told me that he considered himself-


"...the academic counterpart of Errol Garner, the late jazz pianist from my hometown, Pittsburgh, who never learned to read music fearing, as I understand it, that it would ruin his style. I think there must be value in Marxist and other writings, but I did not really read them in college and have had little time since. I am writing this in Pittsburgh where I have been celebrating my 50th law school reunion from Pitt Law School. I do care more about the thought and writings and actions of Du Bois, Robeson, Douglass, et al. I think during my talk at UCLA, I read from the 1935 essay by Ralph Bunche about the futility of using law to overcome racism. It made more sense than so much of the theoretical writings on law, past and present, that I can barely understand and have great difficulty connecting with my experience. And you are right. At almost 77, I do not care to write in ways that whites can vindicate."

Bell even wrote a short story (mentioned above in the critique section) called "The Space Traders". The preface is as follows:

In “The Space Traders,“ aliens arrive and offer the United States ”enough gold to retire the national debt, a magic chemical that will cleanse America’s polluted skies and waters, and a limitless source of safe energy to replace our dwindling reserves.” The U.S. just has to give the aliens one thing in return: all of our black people. (Guess what white Americans decide?)
In the story, aliens visit the United States in the future and offer America eternal peace, prosperity, and health in exchange for all black people in America. The story ends with 70% of Americans voting to send the blacks off, as they are marched, naked and under supervision of white men with weapons, to the alien slave ships.

In fact, a short movie was released called 'Cosmic Slop' which featured Ronald Reagan as an evil alien slave trader.




...and here is more Bell spewing more diarrhea straight out of his mouth:

This is the guy President Obama tells us to "open up our hearts and minds to". I have a feeling this is just the tip of the iceberg.

But, do you know what is most appalling about all of this? Liberals will see this video of Barack Obama embracing Derrick Bell and they will not think a second thought about it. Why? They simply don't care. Likewise, the left wing media, in a continual effort to surround Barack Obama with entrenched fortifications of protection, will not investigate this for a second. For Barack Obama to say we must "open up our hearts and minds" to a man who's entire life, study, and theory is predicated on the belief that all white people are inherently evil and racist is a complete outrage worthy of widespread news coverage. Though, like I said, liberals will not understand, nor will they care, to think on their own or imagine the very implications of this.

In fact, I am thoroughly convinced that a video could be released of Obama murdering a litter of golden retriever puppies with a bloody axe and the left would still respond with the usual, "So, what's so controversial about that?"

No worries. There will be plenty more videos to come. Plenty more ammunition spread by the army of Breitbarts out there. Enough to finally make a complete nationwide mockery of the mainstream media, Barack Obama, and every person supporting him.

BREITBART'S OBAMA SECRETS, Part 2- Obama's Harvard Speech Praising Derrick Bell (VIDEO)

THE VETTING: BEN SMITH RELEASES SELECTIVELY EDITED OBAMA RACE VIDEO

Video will be released tonight along with additional footage that the media and academia have covered up.

Fox News Hannity will air the video in its entirety tonight at 9pm ET, 8PM Central.

Edited Footage:



And here is footage of Charles Ogletree, who taught both Barack and Michelle Obama at Harvard, openly admitting to hiding this footage during the 2008 campaign? Why hide it Mr. Ogletree?


Here are videos of Ogletree's rants against whites, in favor of 9/11 conspiracy theories, criticizing Colin Powell and Clarence Thomas. Here is yet another of Ogletree saying "American patriotism is superficial."

Looks like we got two for one today. Derrick Bell, a hater of anyone white, and Charles Ogletree, a hater of anything American. Two more to add to the list!


And who is Derrick Bell? The Conservative Lady has already done some excellent work digging up his race rants.

I will be making a post shortly on Professor Bell's Critical Race Theory. Stay tuned.

UPDATE:
Here is the Hannity segment showing the full video.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/1494661753001/