CNN suspends Roland Martin over ‘offensive’ Super Bowl tweets
They were offensive and gays were ouuuuuutraged.
Let's look at the tweets in question. First Martin wrote this in lighthearted humor after the risque David Beckham underwear commercial.
If a dude at your Super Bowl party is hyped about David Beckham's H&M underwear ad, smack the ish out of him!
How awful!!
Next, Martin wrote this after observing a Patriot player in pink.
Who the hell was that New England Patriot they just showed in a head to toe pink suit? Oh, he needs a visit from #teamwhipdatass
Several gay and lesbian rights groups were outraged. GLAAD said CNN ought to fire Martin: "Advocates of gay bashing have no place at CNN." Even Glenn Beck found Martin's comments insulting.
How were these comments by Roland Martin in any way directed at or offensive to homos? They weren't. But when you are a militant homosexual who puts sodomy before character (or anything else for that matter) in the public square, you see anything non-homo as a "homophobic" attack on you. Disgusting and outrageous. Not Mr. Martin's comments, which were a bit humorous to a normal person, but rather the reaction from militant activist gays in this country who constantly demand preferential treatment. Even worse, the good tolerant liberals in the upper echelon of CNN bent over backwards to the homosexual agenda and slapped one of their own in the face for nothing more than the fact some radical, dangerous people in this country deemed his
I am offended that these homos were offended. I think GLAAD ought to be disbanded and everyone fired. This won't happen of course, because I am a straight, Republican voting, male of European descent.
No comments:
Post a Comment