Sunday, May 29, 2011
Memorial Day video
Please remember the real meaning of this holiday. So many have suffered, bled, and died for our nation through every war, whether you support it or not, and they deserve our respect!
Saturday, May 28, 2011
Gender relativism strikes again. Canadian parents refuse to acknowledge newborn's gender
Canadian mother defends keeping gender secret
Here is the very core of the modern day secular progressive movement that transcends borders. Complete opposition to anything of substance and reason. Newsflash....gender isn't just about what's between someone's legs....PERVS! I am sick and tired of this foolishness from "enlightened" progressives. These Berkeley types who sip their lattes and put their Che bumper stickers on their Smart Cars are dangerous. Any sliver of tradition is their enemy, including the Constitution and anything else of principle. It is a duty to be odd and rebellious to them. Well, I try to be as professional and withheld as much as I can on here but these people make me sick! They make me want to vomit. I can't even put into words how much far left liberals piss me off. These types of stories come out of the woodwork these days as our country, and our world, continues to drift away from traditional principles to an era of secular humanistic totalitarian rule.
Kathy Witterick said her 4-month-old baby Storm should be able to develop its own sexual identity without having to conform to social stereotypes or bow to predetermined expectations associated with gender.
Witterick, 38, and her husband, David Stocker, 39, have faced a backlash since the couple's story first appeared in the Toronto Star last weekend. Witterick says their critics are being judgmental.
Witterick said in an email Friday that the idea that "the whole world must know what is between the baby's legs is unhealthy, unsafe and voyeuristic. We know — and we're keeping it clean, safe, healthy and private (not secret!)."
Here is the very core of the modern day secular progressive movement that transcends borders. Complete opposition to anything of substance and reason. Newsflash....gender isn't just about what's between someone's legs....PERVS! I am sick and tired of this foolishness from "enlightened" progressives. These Berkeley types who sip their lattes and put their Che bumper stickers on their Smart Cars are dangerous. Any sliver of tradition is their enemy, including the Constitution and anything else of principle. It is a duty to be odd and rebellious to them. Well, I try to be as professional and withheld as much as I can on here but these people make me sick! They make me want to vomit. I can't even put into words how much far left liberals piss me off. These types of stories come out of the woodwork these days as our country, and our world, continues to drift away from traditional principles to an era of secular humanistic totalitarian rule.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
The most fantastic description of Obama I've ever read.
From James Delingpole of The Telegraph...
O'Bama? Oh puh-lease!
Read more at the link above.
O'Bama? Oh puh-lease!
Ah Bejaysus and Begorrah! Oi’ll be swearin’ boi the auld shrine to the Vorgin with the shamrocks growin’ round it next to the hill where Cuchullain slew the Great Leprechaun of Kildare on St Patrick’s Day that Barack Seamus O’Toole Flaherty Joyce O’Bama is the most Irish US president that ever set foot on the Emerald Oisle, so he is, so he is.
Except, when he’s in Africa, of course, when he disappears into the dry ice and re-emerges with a grass skirt and a bone through his nose and declares himself to be Mandingo, Prince of the Bloodline of the Bonga People, Drinker of Cattle Urine, Father of A Thousand Warrior Sons, Keeper of King Solomon’s Mines, Barehanded Slayer of Lions, Undaunted Victim of the Evil Colonial British Empire.
And in the Middle East, where he is Al-Barak Hussein Obama, Protector of the Holy Shrine, Smiter of the Kuffar, Lion of the Desert, Tent-Loving-Aficionado-of-the-Oversweetened-Coffee, Chomper of Sheeps’ Eyeballs, Restorer of the Caliphate.
Etc.
Tony Blair used to do this trick too, his accent mutating from broad Glaswegian to genteel Edinburgh to Mummerset to Estuary to Richard E Grant to Sarf London Grime – often in the course of one Downing Street reception – the better to persuade his target audience that he was their kind of guy. And it is, of course, the hallmark of an unutterable charlatan.
I’ve argued before that Tony Blair and Barack Obama have an awful lot in common. Both are lawyers; both are snake-oil-salesman; both claim to be post-partisan, and Third Way and consensual; both play the acceptable, moderate-seeming public face of a regime chock full of Communists, class warriors, single issue rabble rousers, malcontents, communitarians and eco-loons hell bent on destroying every last vestige of what once made their country great. And both do (or did) the things dodgy political leaders always do when the going gets tough at home and their domestic audience finally wises up to how totally useless they are: they hop on the plane and pose as international statesman instead.
Read more at the link above.
Sunday, May 22, 2011
Netanyahu and Obama. A man and a boy.
This video of Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu firmly, yet graciously, refuting the boy king's preposterous idea that Israel should retreat to pre 1967 borders is quite refreshing.
If you can't see the fundamental difference between these two then I urge you to please take off your Obama 08 campaign shades. Look at each man's posture. Netanyahu sits like a man. Obama sits like a woman. Netanyahu looks confident and sincere. Obama looks like he's about to have a Dumb and Dumber like case of the runs. Obama looks so idiotic here it isn't even funny. What kind of president sits like that with his legs crossed like a businesswoman, kickstand holding his head up, and opposite hand gripping the chair like his life depended on it? I can say this with all political bias aside, President Obama looks just plain foolish here. You can sense the tension and anger in him as Netanyahu slowly, methodically, and professionally dismantles his entire proposal all at once. My God! Somebody actually told him no! What to do!
This is what happens when you have a man go toe to toe with a boy. When Obama was smoking weed at Columbia and attending Marxist youth rallies Netanyahu was running hostage rescue missions in Israeli special forces. There's the difference right there.
If you can't see the fundamental difference between these two then I urge you to please take off your Obama 08 campaign shades. Look at each man's posture. Netanyahu sits like a man. Obama sits like a woman. Netanyahu looks confident and sincere. Obama looks like he's about to have a Dumb and Dumber like case of the runs. Obama looks so idiotic here it isn't even funny. What kind of president sits like that with his legs crossed like a businesswoman, kickstand holding his head up, and opposite hand gripping the chair like his life depended on it? I can say this with all political bias aside, President Obama looks just plain foolish here. You can sense the tension and anger in him as Netanyahu slowly, methodically, and professionally dismantles his entire proposal all at once. My God! Somebody actually told him no! What to do!
This is what happens when you have a man go toe to toe with a boy. When Obama was smoking weed at Columbia and attending Marxist youth rallies Netanyahu was running hostage rescue missions in Israeli special forces. There's the difference right there.
Saturday, May 21, 2011
Gender role swappage in America
Hollywood seems to have a knack for selling masculine females. And feminine males. Why?
Over the past decade there has been a growing trend in what I like to call "Shemale Flicks". By this I mean movies whose female protagonists as well as secondary female characters act like masculine Rambo style killing machines. Tomb Raider, Jonah Hex, Salt, Aeon Flux, Wanted, Elektra, Sucker Punch, Hanna, Dead or Alive. Even films like Avatar and Iron Man 2 entertain us with females who behave as men.
It doesn't stop at Hollywood. Spend twenty minutes watching commercials on TV and you will notice the same trend, sometimes subtle, sometimes not. Women are consistently portrayed as large and in charge, while men retreat into the background of her dominance. A man is never in charge of his household. The woman always does the talking, and is the one doing the decision making while the timid husband follows her around.
Our society has become so strangled by the doctrine of ultra-lib feminism, it has blurred the lines between male and female to the point where it is acceptable, and encouraged, for females to act like males, and vice versa. God forbid Hollywood create a movie where men are the protectors of women! That would be insulting to females! They can just as easily defend themselves from a home intruder with a machete!
I can't stand watching films that show women beating up on men without breaking a sweat, while saying some cheesy one liner to exert her dominance. I can't think of any women I know who could punch a 300 pound guy in the face and knock him through a concrete block wall. Can you? I can't think of any woman I know who could slap a magazine of live ammunition into an assault rifle and return fire while calling in an airstrike to a specific grid of coordinates while under fire from 3 different directions while not even showing a hint of fear. Come to think of it, I can't think of any guys either, including myself. In reality, when put in action situations, the vast majority of women, even feminists who want to be men, would whimper and hide behind the nearest man they could find. Sexist? No, just fact. On the flip side, put the vast majority of men in a nursery with children, and they would also fail miserably.
I'm sick and tired of men being portrayed as pale, weak little helpers of women. Why does Hollywood love to see men take a back seat? Because feminism has infested it with their fantasy that men and women are completely and totally equal. Let's get something straight. Men and women are not equal. Not at all. Men have roles and skills. As do women. Men are better at some things, and women are better at some things. Men have specific desires and goals, and women have specific desires and goals. Enough of this nonsense from far left relativist ideologues who say men and women are completely and totally alike. It is an insult to both men AND women.
Back in the day, a man was someone who protected and provided for his woman. Now, such a notion, is unheard of, and even offensive in the liberal inner circles. That would mean a woman is weaker, and we can't admit that. That's sexist. Women nurtured, comforted, and pleased their men, not because it was their "duty", but because it also pleased them. Women have always been hardwired with a motherly desire to nuture and please. Again, the modern day feminist would regard this concept somehow insulting to women. A sexist notion furthered by chauvinist males.
It has gotten to the point of such absurdity, that women are now being considered to serve in the United States Army Infantry, a combat role traditionally reserved for men. Gender relativism rooted within the secular progressive movement has blurred the lines between male and female and it's only going to get worse.
Such nonsense emanating from the stinking ulcer we know as Hollywood makes me appreciate movies like The Last of the Mohicans. Back when males were strong and daring, rock solid figures of masculinity who protected their women. Sadly, now, such a concept is laughable.
Over the past decade there has been a growing trend in what I like to call "Shemale Flicks". By this I mean movies whose female protagonists as well as secondary female characters act like masculine Rambo style killing machines. Tomb Raider, Jonah Hex, Salt, Aeon Flux, Wanted, Elektra, Sucker Punch, Hanna, Dead or Alive. Even films like Avatar and Iron Man 2 entertain us with females who behave as men.It doesn't stop at Hollywood. Spend twenty minutes watching commercials on TV and you will notice the same trend, sometimes subtle, sometimes not. Women are consistently portrayed as large and in charge, while men retreat into the background of her dominance. A man is never in charge of his household. The woman always does the talking, and is the one doing the decision making while the timid husband follows her around.
Our society has become so strangled by the doctrine of ultra-lib feminism, it has blurred the lines between male and female to the point where it is acceptable, and encouraged, for females to act like males, and vice versa. God forbid Hollywood create a movie where men are the protectors of women! That would be insulting to females! They can just as easily defend themselves from a home intruder with a machete!
I'm sick and tired of men being portrayed as pale, weak little helpers of women. Why does Hollywood love to see men take a back seat? Because feminism has infested it with their fantasy that men and women are completely and totally equal. Let's get something straight. Men and women are not equal. Not at all. Men have roles and skills. As do women. Men are better at some things, and women are better at some things. Men have specific desires and goals, and women have specific desires and goals. Enough of this nonsense from far left relativist ideologues who say men and women are completely and totally alike. It is an insult to both men AND women.
Back in the day, a man was someone who protected and provided for his woman. Now, such a notion, is unheard of, and even offensive in the liberal inner circles. That would mean a woman is weaker, and we can't admit that. That's sexist. Women nurtured, comforted, and pleased their men, not because it was their "duty", but because it also pleased them. Women have always been hardwired with a motherly desire to nuture and please. Again, the modern day feminist would regard this concept somehow insulting to women. A sexist notion furthered by chauvinist males.
It has gotten to the point of such absurdity, that women are now being considered to serve in the United States Army Infantry, a combat role traditionally reserved for men. Gender relativism rooted within the secular progressive movement has blurred the lines between male and female and it's only going to get worse.
Such nonsense emanating from the stinking ulcer we know as Hollywood makes me appreciate movies like The Last of the Mohicans. Back when males were strong and daring, rock solid figures of masculinity who protected their women. Sadly, now, such a concept is laughable.
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Matt Damon in Green Zone: The most anti-American movie I've ever seen
Over a year ago I wrote a blog urging people not to go see the anti-American Matt Damon Iraq War movie Green Zone. Now, a year later and actually in Iraq, I broke my promise, caved in, and decided I'd give it a shot. Seven barf bags and three fist sized holes in the wall later my systolic blood pressure is back down to only twenty points above normal, as opposed to sixty five an hour ago.
This movie made Oliver Stone's Platoon look like a rosy, nationalistic tribute to American involvement in the Vietnam War. From start to finish Green Zone did nothing but demonize, tear down, and spit on American efforts in Iraq, as well as the American troops.
Matt Damon (big surprise there) plays Chief Warrant Officer Roy Miller, an officer in charge of raiding supposed WMD sites in and around Baghdad during the initial invasion in 2003. Upon finding out the intelligence he was given was wrong, he decides to go rogue, disobeying orders while embarking on his own personal quest to find the truth. He eventually gets an American special forces soldier killed while trying to "bring in" an Iraqi general on his own. In a nutshell, this is Matt Damon's left wing wet dream brought to the big screen.
Throughout, we are entertained with scheming Pentagon officials, bloodthirsty and dark US special forces who take away innocent Iraqis with hoods over their heads, and even a bonus television broadcast of President Bush proclaiming "Mission Accomplished" while throngs of ignorant and naive American soldiers applaude. No wonder this movie bombed at the box office! Liberalism and anti-Americanism doesn't sell in an America where only 20% of the population identifies as such. At one point Matt Damon enters the infamous Camp Cropper, a prison in Baghdad where high value prisoners are kept. It just so happens I am stationed at Camp Cropper as I write this and it looks nothing like the way Paul Greengrass in all his enlightened, infinite, liberal wisdom portrayed it. It isn't a dark, American run concentration camp where prisoners are beaten and tortured by evil Americans while pro America propaganda is blared over the PA system.
This film is a disgusting piece of blatant anti-American garbage. Coming from an American soldier who has seen first hand the brutality of Saddam Hussein, I can think of quite a few things they conveniently left out. Nary a word of dictator Saddam Hussein was even mentioned. I urge Matt Damon to take a trip to Baghdad and tour the Baath Party torture chambers and then see how he feels about the liberation of Iraq.
The anti-war arguments put forth in this movie are piddly and insignificant. They cater to ignorant high school and college kids who get all their news from John Stewart and Bill Maher. Those same idiots could just as easily be swayed to the complete opposite side if a Hollywood movie was produced about Saddam Hussein's unspeakable cruelty. It's all the way the wind blows.
I don't know why I'm so worked up over this movie. It didn't even make an impact in the political landscape. But so many American soldiers have given their lives here in Iraq for the very cause Hollywood and Washington liberals like Matt Damon, Paul Greengrass, Barack Obama, John Kerry, Micheal Moore, and Keith Olbermann love to tear down. They claim they support the troops. NO you dont! These worms supporting the troops is the same as someone supporting Alex Rodriguez, Derek Jeter, Mark Texiera, Curtis Granderson, CC Sabathia and the rest of the Yankees roster while wanting the Yankees to lose (or saying the Yankees shouldn't even be playing in the first place). This isn't Fantasy Baseball here. But fantasy is the best word to describe liberal la la land.
There are words here I could say to the likes of Matt Damon and you if you side with him which are unfit for publication on this blog.
I am not here to argue in defense of the Iraq War, but I will say American efforts here have succeeded. We have done the world a service. We are overwhelmingly a force for good. Some people like to believe wars are carried out without any mistakes or bloodshed. Just like the character portrayed in the movie by Damon, those who released this movie while troops are still on the ground in the Middle East are irresponsible traitors!
The movie isn't a lost cause though. There is a good part in the beginning where it shows Saddam Hussein's palaces and Baath Party government buildings getting blown to bits by American bombing. Naturally, Greengrass strategically shows innocent women and children screaming and running for their lives from the evil American bombs! I dismissed that and was thoroughly entertained knowing the evil government of Saddam Hussein was getting annihilated by our righteous justice, WMDs or not!
This movie made Oliver Stone's Platoon look like a rosy, nationalistic tribute to American involvement in the Vietnam War. From start to finish Green Zone did nothing but demonize, tear down, and spit on American efforts in Iraq, as well as the American troops.
Matt Damon (big surprise there) plays Chief Warrant Officer Roy Miller, an officer in charge of raiding supposed WMD sites in and around Baghdad during the initial invasion in 2003. Upon finding out the intelligence he was given was wrong, he decides to go rogue, disobeying orders while embarking on his own personal quest to find the truth. He eventually gets an American special forces soldier killed while trying to "bring in" an Iraqi general on his own. In a nutshell, this is Matt Damon's left wing wet dream brought to the big screen.
This film is a disgusting piece of blatant anti-American garbage. Coming from an American soldier who has seen first hand the brutality of Saddam Hussein, I can think of quite a few things they conveniently left out. Nary a word of dictator Saddam Hussein was even mentioned. I urge Matt Damon to take a trip to Baghdad and tour the Baath Party torture chambers and then see how he feels about the liberation of Iraq.
 |
| Yay! The evil American helicopter has been shot down by the Iraqi freedom fighters! |
I don't know why I'm so worked up over this movie. It didn't even make an impact in the political landscape. But so many American soldiers have given their lives here in Iraq for the very cause Hollywood and Washington liberals like Matt Damon, Paul Greengrass, Barack Obama, John Kerry, Micheal Moore, and Keith Olbermann love to tear down. They claim they support the troops. NO you dont! These worms supporting the troops is the same as someone supporting Alex Rodriguez, Derek Jeter, Mark Texiera, Curtis Granderson, CC Sabathia and the rest of the Yankees roster while wanting the Yankees to lose (or saying the Yankees shouldn't even be playing in the first place). This isn't Fantasy Baseball here. But fantasy is the best word to describe liberal la la land.
There are words here I could say to the likes of Matt Damon and you if you side with him which are unfit for publication on this blog.
I am not here to argue in defense of the Iraq War, but I will say American efforts here have succeeded. We have done the world a service. We are overwhelmingly a force for good. Some people like to believe wars are carried out without any mistakes or bloodshed. Just like the character portrayed in the movie by Damon, those who released this movie while troops are still on the ground in the Middle East are irresponsible traitors!
The movie isn't a lost cause though. There is a good part in the beginning where it shows Saddam Hussein's palaces and Baath Party government buildings getting blown to bits by American bombing. Naturally, Greengrass strategically shows innocent women and children screaming and running for their lives from the evil American bombs! I dismissed that and was thoroughly entertained knowing the evil government of Saddam Hussein was getting annihilated by our righteous justice, WMDs or not!
Obama campaign gets head start with special 'Made in USA' t-shirts!
Obama campaign turns tables on birthers with t-shirts
If 'Made in the USA' has as much truth to it as 'HOPE' did, then I might just have to consider becoming a birther. Ironic, but check the tag on the back and it likely says 'Made in China'.
Other T-shirts the Obama campaign has plans to release are:
- "I stand with Palestinian suicide bombers."
- "UNEMPLOYMENT: 9% Steady! Keep voting Democrat."
- "57 States and Counting"
- "Libyan Liberator"
- "You got to stick with me. You can't lose hope." and
- "14 Trillion dollar debt: 'The slaves didn't give up either.'"
If 'Made in the USA' has as much truth to it as 'HOPE' did, then I might just have to consider becoming a birther. Ironic, but check the tag on the back and it likely says 'Made in China'.
Other T-shirts the Obama campaign has plans to release are:
- "I stand with Palestinian suicide bombers."
- "UNEMPLOYMENT: 9% Steady! Keep voting Democrat."
- "57 States and Counting"
- "Libyan Liberator"
- "You got to stick with me. You can't lose hope." and
- "14 Trillion dollar debt: 'The slaves didn't give up either.'"
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
Video collection of awesome national anthems and flyovers.
There is nothing better than seeing an entire stadium full of people getting fired up after the national anthem and an awesome aircraft flyover! USA!
Track coach fired because male athlete jogged shirtless. Females offended!
No Shirt No Service: High School Coach Jobless After His Boys Track Team Goes Topless
Since when is jogging without a shirt a crime? And since when does being offended mean someone should lose their job? The lesbian females who complained should be punished, not the coach. I'm sure the entire track team, including most the girls team agrees. As a former track runner myself, I remembered days when running shirtless was more than acceptable. Not only did no one complain, but most of the girls actually preferred it. But that was in a small Midwestern town where heterosexuality was the orientation of choice. Not the enlightened, "liberated" suburbs of Boston.
Westwood High track coach Tom Davis was fired last week because one of his runners decided to whip off a shirt during training on a 75-degree day. This wasn't a girl, by the way. It was a boy.
And the Westwood High athletic director, Karl Fogel, was so irate about it that Davis thought he was going to lay him out.
"I fully 100 percent was expecting to be swung at," the coach told NECN TV.
That wasn't the end of it. Davis was let go on the spot, in front of his team, and eventually escorted off school property.
"The kids on my team, it was terrible," Davis told the TV station. "Their faces, just pure disgust, pure fear."
The team was doing quite well this year under the second-year coach: one of the relay teams went to nationals less than two months ago and the outdoor team started off 5-0 this spring. But there was an undercurrent of tension at the school as Fogel told Davis that some members of the girls team felt uncomfortable when the boys ran without shirts. Davis even warned his team about possible punishment for not wearing a shirt.
Then, a week ago Friday, the situation boiled over, with Fogel going chest to chest with the coach, according to the Boston Globe.
Since when is jogging without a shirt a crime? And since when does being offended mean someone should lose their job? The lesbian females who complained should be punished, not the coach. I'm sure the entire track team, including most the girls team agrees. As a former track runner myself, I remembered days when running shirtless was more than acceptable. Not only did no one complain, but most of the girls actually preferred it. But that was in a small Midwestern town where heterosexuality was the orientation of choice. Not the enlightened, "liberated" suburbs of Boston.
Monday, May 9, 2011
Los Angeles Lakers get their butt kicked. What a wonderful day it is.
The most crooked, arrogant, classy team in the history of pro basketball got absolutely slaughtered last night by the Dallas Mavericks, who capped a 4 game sweep by hitting an NBA record 20 three pointers and embarrassing the Lakers like they should be. It wasn't any surprise when the game turned ugly as the Lakers couldn't handle the absolute humiliation.
The citizens of LA should be elated the Lakers lost. Millions of their taxpayer dollars (minus the illegals of course) will now not have to be used to clean up the city had the Lakers won. Stay classy LA.
The citizens of LA should be elated the Lakers lost. Millions of their taxpayer dollars (minus the illegals of course) will now not have to be used to clean up the city had the Lakers won. Stay classy LA.
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
Osama kill aftermath: Hypocrisy of the left
The Osama bin Laden kill is a victory for America and I couldn't be happier for our country. Now that that is out of the way, I'd like to touch base on a few issues that surround the kill; disgusting, repulsive political issues that shouldn't exist, yet do. I did not want to write this but yet again, the left forces me to.
According to every news source covering this, 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammad was the key to finding the bin Laden compound in Pakistan by giving up information on Osama bin Laden's personal courier. How did we obtain this information? Bush era "enhanced interrogation techniques" as the media likes to call it. You and I know it as waterboarding. According to Wikipedia, Khalid Sheikh Mohammad was waterboarded 183 times by the CIA until President Obama discontinued the practice in 2009. Until then, the mastermind of 9/11 had confessed to involvement in at least 31 terror plots and other bits of intelligence, including vital clues about Osama bin Laden's personal courier. Every person in this country with common sense knows the intelligence we obtained over the years to find and kill Osama bin Laden was the result of hard nosed interrogation tactics, including waterboarding. The only people who continue to deny this are those on the left who so adamantly opposed the practice, and likely still do despite the benefits to our country. I suppose Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and others just voluntarily gave up clues to the whereabouts of their most revered leader when we asked them! After hearing incessant whining from liberals during the tumultuous Bush years about how awful it is to "torture" those who would do harm to our country, we now hear nothing but denial from them about its role in capturing and killing Osama bin Laden. Our very own Nobel Peace Prize winning President Barack Obama, the man standing high and mighty with his hands on his hips and flash of the camera in his face can take all the credit he wants. But the facts state otherwise. Not one day into his presidency, and he ordered the shut down of the very prisons where this intelligence was gathered, and the very tactics by which it was gathered. An irony for the ages if you ask this American.
Now, if that isn't enough, we have to listen to this continuous stream of politically correct garbage coming from the left about "Islamic sensitivities". "We don't want to spike the football" says Mr. President. I say, spike the football and boot it into the stands! I say release the photos of bin Laden's carcass for all the world to see! Douse the body in pig blood, and shove a big, fat pork chop in his mouth for all of the Muslim world to see. The American people want to see the evidence. We aren't satisfied with hearing about Osama bin Laden's body being dumped into the sea after being given "a proper Islamic burial". We were able to flip on our TV's on September 11th and watch burning New Yorkers jumping to their deaths from the billowing smoke of the towers but we can't see photos of bin Laden dead? Like the issue of Guantanimo and torture, again Obama is on the wrong side on this as well. Let us drift back to 2009 yet again, when a then newly elected President Obama decided it would be ok to release 2000 photos of prisoner abuse in Iraq and Afghanistan to the public. That is ok, but this isn't?
While the left goes gaga over Obama's achievement they dismiss all the facts as usual. We need a savage in the White House. We need a President who is afraid of no one. I want someone in the white house who will get behind that microphone and metaphorically hold up bin Ladens severed head! Instead we have someone who flinches at the sight of a drop of blood, and a press who encourages it.
According to every news source covering this, 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammad was the key to finding the bin Laden compound in Pakistan by giving up information on Osama bin Laden's personal courier. How did we obtain this information? Bush era "enhanced interrogation techniques" as the media likes to call it. You and I know it as waterboarding. According to Wikipedia, Khalid Sheikh Mohammad was waterboarded 183 times by the CIA until President Obama discontinued the practice in 2009. Until then, the mastermind of 9/11 had confessed to involvement in at least 31 terror plots and other bits of intelligence, including vital clues about Osama bin Laden's personal courier. Every person in this country with common sense knows the intelligence we obtained over the years to find and kill Osama bin Laden was the result of hard nosed interrogation tactics, including waterboarding. The only people who continue to deny this are those on the left who so adamantly opposed the practice, and likely still do despite the benefits to our country. I suppose Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and others just voluntarily gave up clues to the whereabouts of their most revered leader when we asked them! After hearing incessant whining from liberals during the tumultuous Bush years about how awful it is to "torture" those who would do harm to our country, we now hear nothing but denial from them about its role in capturing and killing Osama bin Laden. Our very own Nobel Peace Prize winning President Barack Obama, the man standing high and mighty with his hands on his hips and flash of the camera in his face can take all the credit he wants. But the facts state otherwise. Not one day into his presidency, and he ordered the shut down of the very prisons where this intelligence was gathered, and the very tactics by which it was gathered. An irony for the ages if you ask this American.
Now, if that isn't enough, we have to listen to this continuous stream of politically correct garbage coming from the left about "Islamic sensitivities". "We don't want to spike the football" says Mr. President. I say, spike the football and boot it into the stands! I say release the photos of bin Laden's carcass for all the world to see! Douse the body in pig blood, and shove a big, fat pork chop in his mouth for all of the Muslim world to see. The American people want to see the evidence. We aren't satisfied with hearing about Osama bin Laden's body being dumped into the sea after being given "a proper Islamic burial". We were able to flip on our TV's on September 11th and watch burning New Yorkers jumping to their deaths from the billowing smoke of the towers but we can't see photos of bin Laden dead? Like the issue of Guantanimo and torture, again Obama is on the wrong side on this as well. Let us drift back to 2009 yet again, when a then newly elected President Obama decided it would be ok to release 2000 photos of prisoner abuse in Iraq and Afghanistan to the public. That is ok, but this isn't?
While the left goes gaga over Obama's achievement they dismiss all the facts as usual. We need a savage in the White House. We need a President who is afraid of no one. I want someone in the white house who will get behind that microphone and metaphorically hold up bin Ladens severed head! Instead we have someone who flinches at the sight of a drop of blood, and a press who encourages it.
Monday, May 2, 2011
Osama is finally dead. Where do we go from here?
I got news of Osama bin Laden's death early this morning. It couldn't have put me in a better mood. Morale is high here among the troops; many soldiers I know who were once distraught are now pumped up. The fire we had after 9/11 is back. I have just a few things I want to say about this recent event.
I keep seeing images and videos of half drunk, jubilant Americans shouting and partying in the streets over this. Tomorrow they will be silent. Just like the memory of September 11th faded from so many Americans' minds, so will this. It's just another vain way for people to feel good and patriotic again. Chanting "USA, USA, USA" in the street for a day will do nothing to help the war effort, especially following that up with a chant of "Obama, Obama Obama". A real way you, as an American, can celebrate this is to begin supporting political candidates who sincerely believe in what we are doing, not two faced liars who say one thing, do another, and then claim credit for something they are totally against. While we are on the subject of Americans celebrating I would like to encourage every last person who did not support the war in Afghanistan, or decided it was time for us to retreat even once these past years, to please SIT DOWN and SHUT UP. I don't want to hear a peep from you. If we had your way and accepted defeat, we never would have scored this victory. So for all the defeatists, you should have nothing to say.
Osama bin Laden may be dead, but the War on Terrorism (War on Islamofacsism) is not, nor will it ever be. There are thousands upon thousands of radical Islamic terrorists in the Middle East, in Europe, and likely even in America who are still eager to attack us, if not more so now. It is common knowledge here in Iraq that attacks will now step up because of this. They likely will in Afghanistan too. Expect more terror attacks and general increases in Islamic terror activity in Europe as well. This fight isn't over. I keep hearing people saying how now that Osama is dead the war is magically over and we should pull out of Afghanistan. This is naive and foolish. The enemy is now more emboldened than ever. The American people need to understand this. We do here.
Next, let's get something straight and give credit where it is due. To give President Barack Obama credit for this is completely idiotic. Credit goes to our military, whom Obama has not supported,
as well as President Bush. Like him or not, President Bush laid the groundwork for this kill, while a then Senator Obama did nothing but criticize and whine. Now we watch on CNN as King Obama puffs his chest out for this monumental achievement, "I, I, I." Likely he views it as nothing more than an addition to his war chest for the upcoming campaign.
I know the truth. And the truth is this. The death of Osama bin Laden is only symbolic. We can rejoice as Americans today. But the war isn't over. This very moment, motivated and angered Muslims are preparing plans for their next attacks on Westerners. The worst thing we can do is let up. The best thing we can do is ratchet up the offensive and continue to show the enemy that we are just as motivated, determined, and willing to continue killing them!
I keep seeing images and videos of half drunk, jubilant Americans shouting and partying in the streets over this. Tomorrow they will be silent. Just like the memory of September 11th faded from so many Americans' minds, so will this. It's just another vain way for people to feel good and patriotic again. Chanting "USA, USA, USA" in the street for a day will do nothing to help the war effort, especially following that up with a chant of "Obama, Obama Obama". A real way you, as an American, can celebrate this is to begin supporting political candidates who sincerely believe in what we are doing, not two faced liars who say one thing, do another, and then claim credit for something they are totally against. While we are on the subject of Americans celebrating I would like to encourage every last person who did not support the war in Afghanistan, or decided it was time for us to retreat even once these past years, to please SIT DOWN and SHUT UP. I don't want to hear a peep from you. If we had your way and accepted defeat, we never would have scored this victory. So for all the defeatists, you should have nothing to say.
Osama bin Laden may be dead, but the War on Terrorism (War on Islamofacsism) is not, nor will it ever be. There are thousands upon thousands of radical Islamic terrorists in the Middle East, in Europe, and likely even in America who are still eager to attack us, if not more so now. It is common knowledge here in Iraq that attacks will now step up because of this. They likely will in Afghanistan too. Expect more terror attacks and general increases in Islamic terror activity in Europe as well. This fight isn't over. I keep hearing people saying how now that Osama is dead the war is magically over and we should pull out of Afghanistan. This is naive and foolish. The enemy is now more emboldened than ever. The American people need to understand this. We do here.
Next, let's get something straight and give credit where it is due. To give President Barack Obama credit for this is completely idiotic. Credit goes to our military, whom Obama has not supported,
as well as President Bush. Like him or not, President Bush laid the groundwork for this kill, while a then Senator Obama did nothing but criticize and whine. Now we watch on CNN as King Obama puffs his chest out for this monumental achievement, "I, I, I." Likely he views it as nothing more than an addition to his war chest for the upcoming campaign.
I know the truth. And the truth is this. The death of Osama bin Laden is only symbolic. We can rejoice as Americans today. But the war isn't over. This very moment, motivated and angered Muslims are preparing plans for their next attacks on Westerners. The worst thing we can do is let up. The best thing we can do is ratchet up the offensive and continue to show the enemy that we are just as motivated, determined, and willing to continue killing them!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
