Showing posts with label Liberal Lunacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberal Lunacy. Show all posts

Monday, June 27, 2011

Gender neutral social experiments on children by liberals= CHILD ABUSE

You want to see the complete and utter crumbling of civilization? Put it in the hands of radical progressive liberals.

No 'him' or 'her'; preschool fights gender bias

WARNING: Some of the following content may stimulate gag reflex. Barf bag recommended.

At the "Egalia" preschool, staff avoid using words like "him" or "her" and address the 33 kids as "friends" rather than girls and boys.


From the color and placement of toys to the choice of books, every detail has been carefully planned to make sure the children don't fall into gender stereotypes.


"Society expects girls to be girlie, nice and pretty and boys to be manly, rough and outgoing," says Jenny Johnsson, a 31-year-old teacher. "Egalia gives them a fantastic opportunity to be whoever they want to be."


At Egalia — the title connotes "equality" — boys and girls play together with a toy kitchen, waving plastic utensils and pretending to cook. One boy hides inside the toy stove, his head popping out through a hole.


Lego bricks and other building blocks are intentionally placed next to the kitchen, to make sure the children draw no mental barriers between cooking and construction.


Director Lotta Rajalin notes that Egalia places a special emphasis on fostering an environment tolerant of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people. From a bookcase, she pulls out a story about two male giraffes who are sad to be childless — until they come across an abandoned crocodile egg.


Nearly all the children's books deal with homosexual couples, single parents or adopted children. There are no "Snow White," "Cinderella" or other classic fairy tales seen as cementing stereotypes.

Oh, and my favorite part.... "Staff try to shed masculine and feminine references from their speech, including the pronouns him or her — "han" or "hon" in Swedish. Instead, they've have adopted the genderless "hen," a word that doesn't exist in Swedish but is used in some feminist and gay circles. "We use the word "Hen" for example when a doctor, police, electrician or plumber or such is coming to the kindergarten," Rajalin says. "We don't know if it's a he or a she so we just say 'Hen is coming around 2 p.m.' Then the children can imagine both a man or a woman. This widens their view."


There is so much crap above I cannot address all of it. Like the title of this blog post says, this is child abuse. These are radical liberals abusing children to the worst degree. This social experimentation on innocent children teaching them that everything right with the world is wrong and vice versa should be a crime punishable by years in prison!

Sunday, June 12, 2011

Sarah Palin behind Alaska woman's disappearance.

Missing Alaska sled dog musher turns up alive, safe

An Alaska sled dog musher who had been missing since the Memorial Day weekend has been located alive and safe, the Alaska State Troopers said Saturday.


Melanie Gould, the subject of a search that started June 1, contacted troopers in Cantwell, a community outside of Denali National Park. She is a seven-time veteran of the celebrated Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race.


Gould was transported from there to a hospital in Wasilla, said Megan Peters, a trooper spokeswoman. "She appeared to be in good condition," Peters said in an email.


Peters did not elaborate on Gould's medical state.


Gould did tell troopers that she knew they had been searching for her and that she stayed away from those efforts until now, Peters said.

Due to recent valiant efforts by journalists around the nation, newly released top secret Sarah Palin emails show that the former Governor and mayor or Wasilla was involved in a secret conspiracy that involved a covert operation to kidnap Gould and waterboard her at a secret prison in Nome in order to extract information regarding shortcuts in the new Iditarod course so her husband Todd would be better prepared for next years race. More details to follow...

Friday, June 10, 2011

The media frenzy to discredit Sarah Palin

The rabid dogs came up with nothing! I can't help but laugh at this headline...

Lots of Palin, no bombshells in Alaska emails

Do these disgraceful "journalists" realize how stupid they look? The outright assault on Sarah Palin by the media in the past few years is absolutely disgusting, highlighting the insecurity and foolishness of the left, and the marriage between the Democratic party and the mainstream media for all to see on a grand scale.

As most of you know, I am no fan of Sarah Palin and the only way I will vote for her is if the boy king is the only alternative choice. But, I can't help but see her affect on the cretins in power on the left who hate her. Talk about entertainment.

If the media took half as much effort to dig through the Obamacare law, or investigate Obama in 2008, we would have neither Obamacare nor Obama as president.

Chris Matthews does it again!

I could write an entire blog that focuses on nothing but the incessant ramblings of the left wing scum, Chris Matthews. What a piece of work this guy is.

Get this latest progressive cockamamie, where Matthews weasels his way into the Weinergate scandal. Instead of criticizing the DEMOCRATIC congressman who sent photos of his penis to multiple women online, Matthews insults Christian conservatives who are "backwards" because they feel he was wrong to do so.

"This is, to me, the stakes here. If he stays, they never get the leadership back. They never get the Speakership back because the people in the rural areas of this country who are Christian conservative culturally - you can say backward if you want - but they don't like this kind of stuff at all. They're not part of that 56 percent in Brooklyn and Queens who say, 'okay, we can live with this guy'."


What is this? Is this for real? Oh you bet it is. Moral relativism is a dominant pillar in the ideology of the progressives. The real culprits are those backwoods, redneck, Nascar loving, gun toting, bible thumping hillbillies who didn't make it past the first grade, eat nothing but grits and chew tobacco. How dare they believe in morals and virtue instead of the enlightened Brooklyn and Queens liberals!

Progressives are a different breed entirely.

Saturday, May 28, 2011

Gender relativism strikes again. Canadian parents refuse to acknowledge newborn's gender

Canadian mother defends keeping gender secret

Kathy Witterick said her 4-month-old baby Storm should be able to develop its own sexual identity without having to conform to social stereotypes or bow to predetermined expectations associated with gender.

Witterick, 38, and her husband, David Stocker, 39, have faced a backlash since the couple's story first appeared in the Toronto Star last weekend. Witterick says their critics are being judgmental.

Witterick said in an email Friday that the idea that "the whole world must know what is between the baby's legs is unhealthy, unsafe and voyeuristic. We know — and we're keeping it clean, safe, healthy and private (not secret!)."

Here is the very core of the modern day secular progressive movement that transcends borders. Complete opposition to anything of substance and reason. Newsflash....gender isn't just about what's between someone's legs....PERVS! I am sick and tired of this foolishness from "enlightened" progressives. These Berkeley types who sip their lattes and put their Che bumper stickers on their Smart Cars are dangerous. Any sliver of tradition is their enemy, including the Constitution and anything else of principle. It is a duty to be odd and rebellious to them. Well, I try to be as professional and withheld as much as I can on here but these people make me sick! They make me want to vomit. I can't even put into words how much far left liberals piss me off. These types of stories come out of the woodwork these days as our country, and our world, continues to drift away from traditional principles to an era of secular humanistic totalitarian rule.

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Matt Damon in Green Zone: The most anti-American movie I've ever seen

Over a year ago I wrote a blog urging people not to go see the anti-American Matt Damon Iraq War movie Green Zone. Now, a year later and actually in Iraq, I broke my promise, caved in, and decided I'd give it a shot. Seven barf bags and three fist sized holes in the wall later my systolic blood pressure is back down to only twenty points above normal, as opposed to sixty five an hour ago.

This movie made Oliver Stone's Platoon look like a rosy, nationalistic tribute to American involvement in the Vietnam War. From start to finish Green Zone did nothing but demonize, tear down, and spit on American efforts in Iraq, as well as the American troops.

Matt Damon (big surprise there) plays Chief Warrant Officer Roy Miller, an officer in charge of raiding supposed WMD sites in and around Baghdad during the initial invasion in 2003. Upon finding out the intelligence he was given was wrong, he decides to go rogue, disobeying orders while embarking on his own personal quest to find the truth. He eventually gets an American special forces soldier killed while trying to "bring in" an Iraqi general on his own. In a nutshell, this is Matt Damon's left wing wet dream brought to the big screen.

Throughout, we are entertained with scheming Pentagon officials, bloodthirsty and dark US special forces who take away innocent Iraqis with hoods over their heads, and even a bonus television broadcast of President Bush proclaiming "Mission Accomplished" while throngs of ignorant and naive American soldiers applaude. No wonder this movie bombed at the box office! Liberalism and anti-Americanism doesn't sell in an America where only 20% of the population identifies as such. At one point Matt Damon enters the infamous Camp Cropper, a prison in Baghdad where high value prisoners are kept. It just so happens I am stationed at Camp Cropper as I write this and it looks nothing like the way Paul Greengrass in all his enlightened, infinite, liberal wisdom portrayed it. It isn't a dark, American run concentration camp where prisoners are beaten and tortured by evil Americans while pro America propaganda is blared over the PA system.

This film is a disgusting piece of blatant anti-American garbage. Coming from an American soldier who has seen first hand the brutality of Saddam Hussein, I can think of quite a few things they conveniently left out. Nary a word of dictator Saddam Hussein was even mentioned. I urge Matt Damon to take a trip to Baghdad and tour the Baath Party torture chambers and then see how he feels about the liberation of Iraq.

Yay! The evil American helicopter has been shot down by the Iraqi freedom fighters!
The anti-war arguments put forth in this movie are piddly and insignificant. They cater to ignorant high school and college kids who get all their news from John Stewart and Bill Maher. Those same idiots could just as easily be swayed to the complete opposite side if a Hollywood movie was produced about Saddam Hussein's unspeakable cruelty. It's all the way the wind blows.

I don't know why I'm so worked up over this movie. It didn't even make an impact in the political landscape. But so many American soldiers have given their lives here in Iraq for the very cause Hollywood and Washington liberals like Matt Damon, Paul Greengrass, Barack Obama, John Kerry, Micheal Moore, and Keith Olbermann love to tear down. They claim they support the troops. NO you dont! These worms supporting the troops is the same as someone supporting Alex Rodriguez, Derek Jeter, Mark Texiera, Curtis Granderson, CC Sabathia and the rest of the Yankees roster while wanting the Yankees to lose (or saying the Yankees shouldn't even be playing in the first place). This isn't Fantasy Baseball here. But fantasy is the best word to describe liberal la la land.

There are words here I could say to the likes of Matt Damon and you if you side with him which are unfit for publication on this blog.

I am not here to argue in defense of the Iraq War, but I will say American efforts here have succeeded. We have done the world a service. We are overwhelmingly a force for good. Some people like to believe wars are carried out without any mistakes or bloodshed. Just like the character portrayed in the movie by Damon, those who released this movie while troops are still on the ground in the Middle East are irresponsible traitors!

The movie isn't a lost cause though. There is a good part in the beginning where it shows Saddam Hussein's palaces and Baath Party government buildings getting blown to bits by American bombing. Naturally, Greengrass strategically shows innocent women and children screaming and running for their lives from the evil American bombs! I dismissed that and was thoroughly entertained knowing the evil government of Saddam Hussein was getting annihilated by our righteous justice, WMDs or not!

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Osama kill aftermath: Hypocrisy of the left

The Osama bin Laden kill is a victory for America and I couldn't be happier for our country. Now that that is out of the way, I'd like to touch base on a few issues that surround the kill; disgusting, repulsive political issues that shouldn't exist, yet do. I did not want to write this but yet again, the left forces me to.

According to every news source covering this, 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammad was the key to finding the bin Laden compound in Pakistan by giving up information on Osama bin Laden's personal courier. How did we obtain this information? Bush era "enhanced interrogation techniques" as the media likes to call it. You and I know it as waterboarding. According to Wikipedia, Khalid Sheikh Mohammad was waterboarded 183 times by the CIA until President Obama discontinued the practice in 2009. Until then, the mastermind of 9/11 had confessed to involvement in at least 31 terror plots and other bits of intelligence, including vital clues about Osama bin Laden's personal courier. Every person in this country with common sense knows the intelligence we obtained over the years to find and kill Osama bin Laden was the result of hard nosed interrogation tactics, including waterboarding. The only people who continue to deny this are those on the left who so adamantly opposed the practice, and likely still do despite the benefits to our country. I suppose Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and others just voluntarily gave up clues to the whereabouts of their most revered leader when we asked them! After hearing incessant whining from liberals during the tumultuous Bush years about how awful it is to "torture" those who would do harm to our country, we now hear nothing but denial from them about its role in capturing and killing Osama bin Laden. Our very own Nobel Peace Prize winning President Barack Obama, the man standing high and mighty with his hands on his hips and flash of the camera in his face can take all the credit he wants. But the facts state otherwise. Not one day into his presidency, and he ordered the shut down of the very prisons where this intelligence was gathered, and the very tactics by which it was gathered. An irony for the ages if you ask this American.

Now, if that isn't enough, we have to listen to this continuous stream of politically correct garbage coming from the left about "Islamic sensitivities". "We don't want to spike the football" says Mr. President. I say, spike the football and boot it into the stands! I say release the photos of bin Laden's carcass for all the world to see! Douse the body in pig blood, and shove a big, fat pork chop in his mouth for all of the Muslim world to see. The American people want to see the evidence. We aren't satisfied with hearing about Osama bin Laden's body being dumped into the sea after being given "a proper Islamic burial". We were able to flip on our TV's on September 11th and watch burning New Yorkers jumping to their deaths from the billowing smoke of the towers but we can't see photos of bin Laden dead? Like the issue of Guantanimo and torture, again Obama is on the wrong side on this as well. Let us drift back to 2009 yet again, when a then newly elected President Obama decided it would be ok to release 2000 photos of prisoner abuse in Iraq and Afghanistan to the public. That is ok, but this isn't?

While the left goes gaga over Obama's achievement they dismiss all the facts as usual. We need a savage in the White House. We need a President who is afraid of no one. I want someone in the white house who will get behind that microphone and metaphorically hold up bin Ladens severed head! Instead we have someone who flinches at the sight of a drop of blood, and a press who encourages it.

Saturday, February 26, 2011

A genius video on multiculturalism

Brilliantly accurate.

Political correctness makes its way into the US military

It appears the minions of the ultra PC left have flung their dung in such a wide radius, that even the United States military isn't safe. We already witnessed this with the Obama led repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell during a time of war. If that wasn't psycho enough, now our troops on the ground in Afghanistan will be subjected to Gay Sensitivity Training!

"You guys haven't made any gay jokes have you? You know that's against the law right?"

This is coming straight from the top, initiated by our very own president himself, and executed by his weakling Secretary of Defense! How nice of them.

I want to know why, in a time of war, is it necessary to even consider mentioning the issue of homosexual soldiers? Who cares! The focus should be the mission. The objective. Anyone who has been through basic training knows this. Instead of focusing all of our energy, resources, and time on annihilating the Taliban, our command thinks it pertinent to make sure all our soldiers accept sodomy in the ranks! SHAME on you!

It's disgusting and appalling our country has fallen such a long way in such a short period of time. Whatever happened to the greatest generation? We've gone from a nation of tough, independent, patriotic warriors and pioneers to a culture-less smattering of weak, entitled, careless appeasers!

"If you're a homo, that's ok! Cecil here to my left is too..."


Speaking from military experience.....this training is a joke and will be treated as such by the troops who have to go through it! 

Friday, February 25, 2011

Attention Wisconsin protesters: America is NOT with you.

According to recent data released by Rasmussen Reports...

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 68% of American Adults view being a teacher as one of the most important jobs in our country today, down five points from May of last year but up slightly from when we first asked the question in May 2008. Twenty-one percent (21%) say it’s not one of the most important jobs, and 12% aren’t sure. (To see survey question wording, click here.)


Thirty-seven percent (37%) say, in terms of its impact on the nation, it’s a good thing that most teachers belong to public employee unions. Forty-six percent (46%) disagree and say it’s a bad thing that most teachers are unionized. Seventeen percent (17%) are not sure.


In late April 2010 when we offered “neither” as another option, 38% of adults said it’s good that most teachers belong to a public employee union, but 34% said it’s a bad thing. Thirteen percent (13%) viewed it as neither, and 14% were undecided.


Among adults who currently have children in grades K through 12, however, a majority (54%) now views unionized teachers as bad for the country.


A plurality (45%) also believes public school teachers are paid too little, but that’s trending down from 51% last August and 57% in May 2008. Eighteen percent (18%) now say teachers are paid too much, while 32% think their level of pay is about right.


In the current political dispute in Wisconsin, 47% of voters nationwide agree with the Republican governor who wants to limit the union rights of some public employees, while 42% support the unions for teachers and other state employees. However, 61% say members of public employee unions should contribute the same percentage to their health care and pension plans as those in the private sector pay which many unionized teachers currently do not do.

We can see here that, while not a huge majority, most Americans do not side with the union takers of society. Other polls offer even more evidence regarding the political ideology of Americans...

67% oppose the actions of Democrats fleeing their states.
37% agree that President Obama is doing a good job as a leader.
25% have a favorable opinion of Harry Reid...28% of Pelosi, and 46% of Boehner.
46% approve of Obama, 54% disapprove
42% of Americans conservative; 20% liberal



















50% pro life, 42% pro choice
28% approve of the way Obama is handling illegal immigration, 60% disapprove
50% favor the Arizona immigration law, 31% oppose
55% favor abolishing affirmative action programs, 36% disagree
61% oppose Ground Zero mosque
37% have a favorable view of Islam

Look up any political topic or issue, and you'll find that America is a center right nation. That's why Fox News destroys the liberal networks in the ratings day in and day out.

That is all.

Monday, February 21, 2011

What's really beneath the Wisconsin union protests.

For the past week we've seen throngs of union employees, Communists, idiots, race baiters, Marxist rock starsphony doctors, and haters of Fox News grace the capital of Wisconsin with their presence. This is the "Tea Party of the Left, Obama's Genius" as the left wing San Francisco Chronicle so dutifully informs us. In reality, it's a left wing paradise, a hub of idiocy and rage fueled by class warfare and organized by the Democratic Party. I like to call it, the Berkeley of the Midwest.

So let's get down to the nitty gritty. What are these people so mad about? Most are union workers that are angry they now have to pay a small amount of money into their own pensions and health insurance. Let's face it. Government employees have in no way, shape, or form suffered near as much financially as private sector employees have during the economic crisis. Yet, they continue to scream like young children in need of a diaper change when the time comes they need to tighten their collective belt like everyone else. The tiny dent in their checkbook, while the source of much of the rage, seems to be a secondary issue though. One needs only to listen to what the union thugs and hooligans running rampant in Madison are saying to see the bigger picture. "This is an attack on the working man!", they say. It's funny, I haven't heard a peep from the 70+% of private sector employees in Wisconsin, or anywhere else for that matter, complaining. This is hatred for the rich. It is the advocation of redistribution of wealth. It is an attack on the Capitalist system. It is none other than a reformed, Americanized attack by the Proletariat on the Bourgeoisie. ---WATCH---. It can best be summed up in one Communist youth's Democrat regurgitation that we must "tax the rich" in order to solve this problem. By no means is this the first time we have heard this from the talking heads of the left. The protest has become ground zero for all things anti-American and extreme, attracting all kinds of leftist revolutionaries eager to exploit the emotion and youth within the crowd. Communists? Jesse Jackson? I think in this instance, guilt by association does apply!

They claim this is an assault on personal freedoms and "rights" by the government. Is it really? Amid all this screeching is an irony so ridiculous it's almost laughable. These people, all union Democrats, are complaining about infringement of rights yet it is likely most all of them adamantly supported Obamacare, arguably the largest assault on individual rights in the history of this country. These people claim to be the ones who support the working man.......as long as they belong in an organized union. Unless you are, you don't count. What's more ironic, these leftists love big government, and here, they are arguing about government's intrusiveness into their lives. Why, they would make great Tea Partiers! Isn't this supposed to be the party of personal sacrifice for the benefit of all? Here's your big chance.

Let's take the teachers from Milwaukee, Wisconsin. On average, they earn a yearly salary of $100,000/year. In my mind, these people have nothing to protest. It is appalling that these government workers, most of whom make more money than they contribute, would skip work to complain about their "rights", and drag their apolitical students into their own political battle, for their own political and personal gain. This proposed bill is no more a trampling of rights than Obama is a Republican, and you can take that to the bank. Unions protect unproductive workers. Unions are the primary reason for Detroit going under. Unions are the root of the problem!

Governor Scott Walker was elected fair and square. He was elected by the majority of Wisconsin citizens to do this job. The actions of this small, union minority, and yes they most certainly are the minority despite what the media would tell you, are a slap in the face to the people of Wisconsin and taxpayers in general.

I said I'd get down to the nitty gritty and here it is. Wisconsin is broke. If the masses of idiots who have converged on Madison get their way there is only one other alternative. Mass layoffs. So the way I see it they have a choice. Either...

A) Accept the distinct possibility of losing your job.
or
B) Sit down, shut up, and make a little sacrifice for the good of the state.

Because that's what leftists are all about, right?

Sunday, February 20, 2011

VIDEO: Communists join union protesters in Wisconsin.

Want another reason why not to support the union thugs in the cheese state?



What does this tell you?

Friday, February 18, 2011

Wisconsin Code 946.12: The 14 Democrats who fled committed a Class I Felony

2010 Wisconsin Code
Chapter 946. Crimes against government and its administration.
946.12 Misconduct in public office.


946.12
946.12 Misconduct in public office. Any public officer or public employee who does any of the following is guilty of a Class I felony:
946.12(1)
(1) Intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of the officer's or employee's office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law.

Democrats' new strategy: Go into hiding and stay there.

Wisconsin Democrats could stay away for weeks

Democrats on the run in Wisconsin avoided state troopers Friday and threatened to stay in hiding for weeks, potentially paralyzing a state government they no longer control.

If this is the course of action these whimpering, soiled britches Democrats want to take then I say they should not be allowed to return to their jobs. What kind of "public servants" are these?

Why are Democrats so unreasonable?

Let's recap the situation in Wisconsin. The state is in a budget crisis. Governor proposes meager cuts to union teacher benefits, still leaving them far above the average private sector worker's benefits. Union Democrat teachers refuse to teach so they can riot like immature children because now they will only make 95,000 dollars a year instead of 100,000! They exploit their students by bringing them along to the DNC organized protest. Dem lawmakers, knowing they don't have the votes to win, decide to skip town and avoid casting a vote, crossing over the border into Illinois like an outlaw into Mexico. What complete and utter nonsense!

Naturally, our fearless leader backs up those who would bankrupt the state further so they can make more money than they deserve, at the expense of the taxpayer. The ironic part? These crooks, losers, and crybaby infants claim to be the party who fights for the lower and middle class, yet their actions speak louder on the contrary. Now, instead of making these meager cuts in union benefits, the state will be forced to lay people off. They don't seem to understand that part.

Democrats, and many Republicans, have this wild idea that money can be wished for out of thin air. They support an unsustainable model that will lead only to bankruptcy and disaster. We see this on local, state, and national levels.

These cowardly Democrats who refuse to do their job should be brought in by the US Marshals, arrested, tried, convicted, and sent to prison!


Here are the names of the 14 criminals...

Tim Carpenter
Spencer Coggs 
Tim Cullen 
Jon Erpenbach
Dave Hansen 
Jim Holperin 
Robert Jauch 
Chris Larson
Julie Lassa
Mark Miller
Fred Risser
Lena Taylor
Kathleen Vinehout
Robert Wirch 



And every teacher that "called in sick" for their own personal and political gain should be FIRED.

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

The tolerance of the left. Hang Clarence Thomas!

Listen to these raaaacist Tea Part--I mean leftists voice their opinions of Justice Clarence Thomas.



Aren't these the people that so often claim to be on the side of the minorities? These are the tolerant, progressive, peace lovers? Ha! Liberal rallies are like cesspools of writhing, grotesque maggots congregating and swimming in a pile of green crap, their ideology. They are fraudulent, intolerant, militant, violent and prejudiced, all while screaming their opposition as being exactly that.

Who are 21st century liberals really? They are a far distant cry from the classical liberals of old, such as the Founders. The classical liberals stood for liberty, hence the term liberal. Today, "liberals" stand for the exact opposite. Modern day liberalism is an ideology of intolerant fanatics with no principles of definition. Modern day liberals stand for nothing other than their own existence, and the imposition of their world view on others. Their world is gray, they have no allegiance. They are inherently violent and vulgar; their rallies tell the tale. They have no sense of reason, purpose, or decency. They hate those who are different from them. That is the 21st century "liberal". One who stands not for liberty, but totalitarianism, and the "good of all".


Oh, and has anyone heard from the NAACP on this? L O L

Monday, February 7, 2011

Left wing academia breeds stupidity

Have you ever met a person who was so smart they were actually stupid? Listen to this clip and you'll know exactly what I mean. I highly encourage you listen to the whole fourteen minutes.



To anyone who has been through any American college or university you know all too well the type. There is a difference between book smarts and common sense. Liberal academia is infested with over intelligent idiots who pride themselves in their extended vocabulary and ability to cite random fun facts of nothingness. Like the caller, they have a special knack for talking for extended periods of time but actually saying absolutely nothing. Notice a few things.

-his complete disregard for definition/embrace of universal relativism ("You said good and bad, what does that mean?")
-his worship of social Darwinism
-his hopeless worldview
-his admission of treason/weakness ("If you can't beat them, join them.")


Embedded within the liberal academic community is a certain stupidity that only an academic can master.

Sunday, January 2, 2011

Katie Couric- Did she really just say that?

We all knew she was a buffoon anyway but her most recent blathering of mushmouth stupidity puts her in good company with the likes of Rosie O'Donnell, Chris Matthews, Hugo Chavez, and Porky Pig.

Katie Couric, CBS anchor, suggests America needs a Muslim version of 'The Cosby Show'


The CBS News anchor made the suggestion on her web show while discussing the biggest news stories of 2010, including the mosque near Ground Zero and the "seething hatred" that has grown against Muslims in America.

"Maybe we need a Muslim version of 'The Cosby Show'... I know that sounds crazy, I know that sounds crazy," said Couric. "But 'The Cosby Show' did so much to change attitudes about African-Americans in this country, and I think sometimes people are afraid of things they don't understand."

Katie, I think we all understand Muslims quite well. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that Muslims are inherently violent and incompatible with Western society. I'm sure the Jews getting rocketed everyday in Israel understand the Muslims well. I'm sure the Russians who saw their people annihilated from Islamic bomb blasts in Moscow understand Muslims now. The same goes for the Brits who witnessed Muslims protesting and insulting British troops returning home from Afghanistan. I'm sure the Spaniards have a pretty good idea of who the Muslims are now, after seeing hundreds of their people, innocent men, women, and children of all ages obliterated by Muslim bombs as they boarded a train in Madrid. Shall we continue Katie? I think I will! The Egyptian Copts know Muslims perhaps better than anyone. They live among them and are subjected to ruthless attacks by them all the time. Just a few days ago Muslims bombed a church full of them. The Dutch certainly know and understand Muslims. Just ask filmmaker Theo van Gogh. Oh wait, he's dead, murdered by Muslims. The Danes have a pretty good idea as well. You can ask Kurt Westergaard and his granddaughter about that. Or please feel free to ask any Christian living in Pakistan, Indonesia, or Thailand. I would bet the Christians in Nigeria have a very good understanding of Muslims where they live. Most importantly, I'm pretty sure New Yorkers now understand Muslims after watching thousands of their people die horrible deaths at the hand of Muslims.

As of today Katie, Muslims account for over 75% of the world's terrorist activity, and over 90% of all conflict zones worldwide. Yet somehow they are the victim? Whose side are you on?

Aside from insulting Bill Cosby and blacks in general with your statement, you have also aligned yourself with the most violent people on planet earth. Good work.

Not only that, you have also given us a prime example and flawless demonstration of the elite, white liberal mentality.

First, insinuating that somehow the Cosby Show's purpose was simply for blacks to gain the approval of whites by painting them as a typical "white American" family. Right Katie?

Now that the mean white man doesn't hate the black man anymore (thanks to Bill Cosby of course) we need a Muslim tv show that falsely portrays the American Muslim as a typical white American. Then we will all hold hands, the bombings will stop, and Sleeper Cell Mohammad in New York and Billy Bob Redneck in Tennessee will together sing kumbaya in loving embrace for countless utopian liberal years to come.

Ahhh, thank god for Katie Couric and her infinite liberal wisdom. What would the poor, helpless people of color do without her?

I have an idea. Let's let Katie Couric play the burqua'd up Muslim housewife living under Sharia law in this new Muslim sitcom! I'm sure you'd love that wouldn't you Katie? ......Katie?


I think I got my point across.

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Al Sharpton proposes totalitarian government takeover of talk radio.

Al Sharpton is at it again, this time throwing a revolting temper tantrum in which he proposes the government take conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh off the air.

"Rush Limbaugh has the right to say whatever he wants to say, he does not have the right to do it on the public regulated airwaves," Sharpton told Ed Schultz.

Then neither should you! What an irrelevant, little man the "Reverend" is. Do people even listen to him anymore? It is amazing a person can make a living out of stirring up racial strife, then pointing the finger at the other guy. Al Sharpton is a destroyer. It's what he does. Everything he touches he pollutes, including the black community who supports him. He binds them in the chains of government dependence, victimization, and economic entitlement with every last poisonous word that comes out of his mouth.

I'm going to give liberals the benefit of the doubt and say not all of them support this slimebucket or his fanatical and immature notions of silencing the opposition through force. But these ridiculous ideas are coming from the left, and that should not be ignored. Reminds me of a time not too long ago when Rosie O'Donnell proposed the United States government seize British Petroleum because Mother Earth was "hemorrhaging". What preposterous nonsense.

I'll be waiting for those on the left who strive to stand for peace, love, tolerance, and "reaching across the aisle" to shoot down Sharpton's inane squabbling and soiled britches over a political adversary he has neither the brains nor guts to debate.

Somehow, I don't expect to hear much.

Monday, December 6, 2010

Wikileaks' anti-American agenda, and the people who support them.

It isn't hard to look at the top secret materials Wikileaks chooses to release as a whole and realize Julian Assange and company have an obvious anti-American agenda. Specifically, an agenda against the American military and our efforts in the war on terrorism.

I noticed this months ago with Wikileaks' release of the infamous 'Collateral Murder' video showing US troops killing Iraqi civilians suspected of being insurgents. This was back in April.

Today, we witness the coward and sex criminal Assange and his cohorts releasing thousands of top secret American documents, including most recently a list of key places of interest we have listed as vital to American national security.

Julian Assange may be Australian. But he is acting as a military combatant against the United States, and his weapon of choice is not an AK-47 or RPG, but the internet, and he is utilizing his resources effectively. He should be treated as such, brought in, tried, convicted, and punished accordingly.

While Assange is defaming America and putting American lives at risk, there are the usual people supporting his actions. Over at the enlightened liberal Daily Kos, we see praise for the "brilliant" Assange as somehow being a champion of freedom. We have the typical liberal response that Wikileaks is simply doing its part to create a more transparent and pure democracy. And Ron Paul, the anarchist who does not, nor will ever, have the support of this libertarian, thinks Julian Assange is doing America a service and should be supported at all costs.

Let's be frank. Liberals love Wikileaks because they make America look bad. They expressed outright glee over the release of documents depicting American war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan. And they are as giddy as ever now with the release of more harmful information. And Ron Paul, that treasonous turd, will never get my vote.

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Oh the Joy. Joy Behar's nice words for Sharron Angle.

"Bill O'Reilly hurt my feelings! Someone bring me
some more Kool Aid!"
'The View': Joy Behar tells Sharron Angle to 'go to hell, bitch'

Joy Behar condemned a political ad by Nevada Republican Senate nominee Sharron Angle as fomenting racial divisiveness. The View aired Angle’s latest TV ad on the talk show on Tuesday morning. Looking at the camera, Behar addressed Angle, calling her a “bitch” and concluding that Angle is “going to hell, this bitch.”


Behar described the ad as “a Hitler youth commercial,” said Angle is “a moron on top of being evil” and also dared Angle to “do this ad in the South Bronx,” implying that New Yorkers wouldn’t stand for it.

Joy Behar of all people calling someone else a bitch???  Talk about irony! Here is the ad she got so worked up over.



How awful. How racist. What an evil, evil, woman our next senator from Nevada is.