Saturday, February 26, 2011

A genius video on multiculturalism

Brilliantly accurate.

Political correctness makes its way into the US military

It appears the minions of the ultra PC left have flung their dung in such a wide radius, that even the United States military isn't safe. We already witnessed this with the Obama led repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell during a time of war. If that wasn't psycho enough, now our troops on the ground in Afghanistan will be subjected to Gay Sensitivity Training!

"You guys haven't made any gay jokes have you? You know that's against the law right?"

This is coming straight from the top, initiated by our very own president himself, and executed by his weakling Secretary of Defense! How nice of them.

I want to know why, in a time of war, is it necessary to even consider mentioning the issue of homosexual soldiers? Who cares! The focus should be the mission. The objective. Anyone who has been through basic training knows this. Instead of focusing all of our energy, resources, and time on annihilating the Taliban, our command thinks it pertinent to make sure all our soldiers accept sodomy in the ranks! SHAME on you!

It's disgusting and appalling our country has fallen such a long way in such a short period of time. Whatever happened to the greatest generation? We've gone from a nation of tough, independent, patriotic warriors and pioneers to a culture-less smattering of weak, entitled, careless appeasers!

"If you're a homo, that's ok! Cecil here to my left is too..."


Speaking from military experience.....this training is a joke and will be treated as such by the troops who have to go through it! 

Friday, February 25, 2011

Attention Wisconsin protesters: America is NOT with you.

According to recent data released by Rasmussen Reports...

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 68% of American Adults view being a teacher as one of the most important jobs in our country today, down five points from May of last year but up slightly from when we first asked the question in May 2008. Twenty-one percent (21%) say it’s not one of the most important jobs, and 12% aren’t sure. (To see survey question wording, click here.)


Thirty-seven percent (37%) say, in terms of its impact on the nation, it’s a good thing that most teachers belong to public employee unions. Forty-six percent (46%) disagree and say it’s a bad thing that most teachers are unionized. Seventeen percent (17%) are not sure.


In late April 2010 when we offered “neither” as another option, 38% of adults said it’s good that most teachers belong to a public employee union, but 34% said it’s a bad thing. Thirteen percent (13%) viewed it as neither, and 14% were undecided.


Among adults who currently have children in grades K through 12, however, a majority (54%) now views unionized teachers as bad for the country.


A plurality (45%) also believes public school teachers are paid too little, but that’s trending down from 51% last August and 57% in May 2008. Eighteen percent (18%) now say teachers are paid too much, while 32% think their level of pay is about right.


In the current political dispute in Wisconsin, 47% of voters nationwide agree with the Republican governor who wants to limit the union rights of some public employees, while 42% support the unions for teachers and other state employees. However, 61% say members of public employee unions should contribute the same percentage to their health care and pension plans as those in the private sector pay which many unionized teachers currently do not do.

We can see here that, while not a huge majority, most Americans do not side with the union takers of society. Other polls offer even more evidence regarding the political ideology of Americans...

67% oppose the actions of Democrats fleeing their states.
37% agree that President Obama is doing a good job as a leader.
25% have a favorable opinion of Harry Reid...28% of Pelosi, and 46% of Boehner.
46% approve of Obama, 54% disapprove
42% of Americans conservative; 20% liberal



















50% pro life, 42% pro choice
28% approve of the way Obama is handling illegal immigration, 60% disapprove
50% favor the Arizona immigration law, 31% oppose
55% favor abolishing affirmative action programs, 36% disagree
61% oppose Ground Zero mosque
37% have a favorable view of Islam

Look up any political topic or issue, and you'll find that America is a center right nation. That's why Fox News destroys the liberal networks in the ratings day in and day out.

That is all.

Thursday, February 24, 2011

What else is new? Muslim man caught before carrying out Jihad.

Saudi man charged with plotting terrorist attack

A college student from Saudi Arabia who studied chemical engineering in Texas bought explosive chemicals online as part of a plan to hide bomb materials inside dolls and baby carriages to blow up dams, nuclear plants or the Dallas home of former President George W. Bush, the Justice Department said Thursday.

"After mastering the English language, learning how to build explosives and continuous planning to target the infidel Americans, it is time for jihad," or holy war, Khalid Ali-M Aldawsari wrote in his private journal, according to court documents.

The 20-year-old Aldawsari wrote that he was planning an attack in the United States for years, even before coming to the U.S. on a scholarship. He said he was influenced by Osama bin Laden's speeches and that he bemoaned the plight of Muslims.

Yet another piece of evidence proving that we are at war with the religion of "piece". Another addition to the long list of violent attacks and attempted attacks by a specific demographic. 18-30 year old Muslim males.

I don't need to sit here and waste my breathe trying to prove to those in denial that the threat isn't there. It's clear, cut and dried. If you are unable to process this information then I pray for you.

It is no wonder the North Carolina based chemical company called the FBI immediately after they received a call from a Khalid Ali-M Aldawsari. What did he expect?

Now, the media is bending over backwards to label this man a "lone wolf", just as they did the shoe bomber, underwear bomber, and Fort Hood gunman. It seems the term is as prevalent to satisfy the politically correct left wing media cravings, as the term "quagmire" was during the Iraq War. Utterly ridiculous.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Video collage: Footage of the Libyan riots and government response

Let us hope and pray this never comes to America.











Monday, February 21, 2011

What's really beneath the Wisconsin union protests.

For the past week we've seen throngs of union employees, Communists, idiots, race baiters, Marxist rock starsphony doctors, and haters of Fox News grace the capital of Wisconsin with their presence. This is the "Tea Party of the Left, Obama's Genius" as the left wing San Francisco Chronicle so dutifully informs us. In reality, it's a left wing paradise, a hub of idiocy and rage fueled by class warfare and organized by the Democratic Party. I like to call it, the Berkeley of the Midwest.

So let's get down to the nitty gritty. What are these people so mad about? Most are union workers that are angry they now have to pay a small amount of money into their own pensions and health insurance. Let's face it. Government employees have in no way, shape, or form suffered near as much financially as private sector employees have during the economic crisis. Yet, they continue to scream like young children in need of a diaper change when the time comes they need to tighten their collective belt like everyone else. The tiny dent in their checkbook, while the source of much of the rage, seems to be a secondary issue though. One needs only to listen to what the union thugs and hooligans running rampant in Madison are saying to see the bigger picture. "This is an attack on the working man!", they say. It's funny, I haven't heard a peep from the 70+% of private sector employees in Wisconsin, or anywhere else for that matter, complaining. This is hatred for the rich. It is the advocation of redistribution of wealth. It is an attack on the Capitalist system. It is none other than a reformed, Americanized attack by the Proletariat on the Bourgeoisie. ---WATCH---. It can best be summed up in one Communist youth's Democrat regurgitation that we must "tax the rich" in order to solve this problem. By no means is this the first time we have heard this from the talking heads of the left. The protest has become ground zero for all things anti-American and extreme, attracting all kinds of leftist revolutionaries eager to exploit the emotion and youth within the crowd. Communists? Jesse Jackson? I think in this instance, guilt by association does apply!

They claim this is an assault on personal freedoms and "rights" by the government. Is it really? Amid all this screeching is an irony so ridiculous it's almost laughable. These people, all union Democrats, are complaining about infringement of rights yet it is likely most all of them adamantly supported Obamacare, arguably the largest assault on individual rights in the history of this country. These people claim to be the ones who support the working man.......as long as they belong in an organized union. Unless you are, you don't count. What's more ironic, these leftists love big government, and here, they are arguing about government's intrusiveness into their lives. Why, they would make great Tea Partiers! Isn't this supposed to be the party of personal sacrifice for the benefit of all? Here's your big chance.

Let's take the teachers from Milwaukee, Wisconsin. On average, they earn a yearly salary of $100,000/year. In my mind, these people have nothing to protest. It is appalling that these government workers, most of whom make more money than they contribute, would skip work to complain about their "rights", and drag their apolitical students into their own political battle, for their own political and personal gain. This proposed bill is no more a trampling of rights than Obama is a Republican, and you can take that to the bank. Unions protect unproductive workers. Unions are the primary reason for Detroit going under. Unions are the root of the problem!

Governor Scott Walker was elected fair and square. He was elected by the majority of Wisconsin citizens to do this job. The actions of this small, union minority, and yes they most certainly are the minority despite what the media would tell you, are a slap in the face to the people of Wisconsin and taxpayers in general.

I said I'd get down to the nitty gritty and here it is. Wisconsin is broke. If the masses of idiots who have converged on Madison get their way there is only one other alternative. Mass layoffs. So the way I see it they have a choice. Either...

A) Accept the distinct possibility of losing your job.
or
B) Sit down, shut up, and make a little sacrifice for the good of the state.

Because that's what leftists are all about, right?

Sunday, February 20, 2011

VIDEO: Communists join union protesters in Wisconsin.

Want another reason why not to support the union thugs in the cheese state?



What does this tell you?

Friday, February 18, 2011

Wisconsin Code 946.12: The 14 Democrats who fled committed a Class I Felony

2010 Wisconsin Code
Chapter 946. Crimes against government and its administration.
946.12 Misconduct in public office.


946.12
946.12 Misconduct in public office. Any public officer or public employee who does any of the following is guilty of a Class I felony:
946.12(1)
(1) Intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of the officer's or employee's office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law.

Democrats' new strategy: Go into hiding and stay there.

Wisconsin Democrats could stay away for weeks

Democrats on the run in Wisconsin avoided state troopers Friday and threatened to stay in hiding for weeks, potentially paralyzing a state government they no longer control.

If this is the course of action these whimpering, soiled britches Democrats want to take then I say they should not be allowed to return to their jobs. What kind of "public servants" are these?

Why are Democrats so unreasonable?

Let's recap the situation in Wisconsin. The state is in a budget crisis. Governor proposes meager cuts to union teacher benefits, still leaving them far above the average private sector worker's benefits. Union Democrat teachers refuse to teach so they can riot like immature children because now they will only make 95,000 dollars a year instead of 100,000! They exploit their students by bringing them along to the DNC organized protest. Dem lawmakers, knowing they don't have the votes to win, decide to skip town and avoid casting a vote, crossing over the border into Illinois like an outlaw into Mexico. What complete and utter nonsense!

Naturally, our fearless leader backs up those who would bankrupt the state further so they can make more money than they deserve, at the expense of the taxpayer. The ironic part? These crooks, losers, and crybaby infants claim to be the party who fights for the lower and middle class, yet their actions speak louder on the contrary. Now, instead of making these meager cuts in union benefits, the state will be forced to lay people off. They don't seem to understand that part.

Democrats, and many Republicans, have this wild idea that money can be wished for out of thin air. They support an unsustainable model that will lead only to bankruptcy and disaster. We see this on local, state, and national levels.

These cowardly Democrats who refuse to do their job should be brought in by the US Marshals, arrested, tried, convicted, and sent to prison!


Here are the names of the 14 criminals...

Tim Carpenter
Spencer Coggs 
Tim Cullen 
Jon Erpenbach
Dave Hansen 
Jim Holperin 
Robert Jauch 
Chris Larson
Julie Lassa
Mark Miller
Fred Risser
Lena Taylor
Kathleen Vinehout
Robert Wirch 



And every teacher that "called in sick" for their own personal and political gain should be FIRED.

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

CBS News reporter Lara Logan gets a taste of Islam.

Earlier this week reports of the horrific attack on CBS News anchor Lara Logan by a mob of Muslim men in Egypt rocked the Western world.

“She and her team and their security were surrounded by dangerous elements amidst the celebration. It was a mob of more than 200 people whipped into a frenzy,” CBS said. She “was surrounded and suffered a brutal and sustained sexual assault and beating before being saved by a group of women and an estimated 20 Egyptian soldiers.”

A mob of fanatic Muslim men brutally rape and beat an innocent woman, and where are the outcries from the feminists in America? Not a peep. Why? I can think of no other reason other than the fact the perpetrators were Muslim men.

The attack on Lara Logan offers the ignorant layman a glimpse into the Islamic world, and the Islamic attitude towards women. We all know the brutality and oppression Islamic women face in the Middle East and elsewhere. But the treatment towards foreign women (khaffirs) by Muslims is even worse, as we all have seen. Left wingers and feminists in America love to tout their record of fighting for the oppressed, yet they never call out the Muslim world for their barbarity, and sometimes ignore it altogether. It is despicable. It is a crime. In addition to the gangrape of Lara Logan by the religion of Islam, other women in the crowds report being assaulted by Muslim men as well.

In some areas, men formed human chains, cordoning off groups of women and children from pushing hordes. But it wasn't enough protection, and women reported later that they were sexually harassed — stared at, shouted at, and groped — that night.
"All the men were very respectful during the revolution," said Nawla Darwiche, an Egyptian feminist. "Sexual harassment didn't occur during the revolt. It occurred during that night. I was personally harassed that night."


Currently, Muslim radicals are rioting in Iran, Yemen, Bahrain, Libya, Tunisia, and Egypt. Iraq is next. What is the real reason behind the revolution rocking the Middle East? Is it because they all of a sudden really want democracy? That's a first! No, my friends. Don't get caught up in Western ignorance, denial, and stupidity. Muslims do not want democracy, nor do they like it. It is the antithesis of their religion and way of life. I speculate the riots sweeping across the region are the result of two things. One, the final straw between ongoing conflicts between Shia and Sunni, obviously. And two, inherent violence present within the Muslim peoples of the Middle East.

Like the brutal rape of Lara Logan by a gang of 200 Muslim men, Muslims continue to show the world what kind of people they are. Violence and Islam go hand in hand. It has been so since the 7th century. It is my belief that every Muslim man has a deep seeded desire to engage in violence for Allah, and the riots taking place are evidence of this. The bloodthirsty tendencies of Islam have intersected with the modern era of social media and has enabled the message of jihadists like the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qeada to spread like wildfire and spawn demonstrations across the entire region. This is a revolution, an Islamic revolution with a common tie that spans nations and borders. Islamic terrorists support this revolution. Words of praise from both Al Qeada and Iranian dictator Ahmedinejad have been spewed. Just today, over a hundred Islamic terrorists were released from prison in Libya. Is this a good thing? Is this democracy? Hardly. Islamic radicals will take the reigns of these demonstrations and torch the Middle East in radicalism. Mubarak, Ghaddfi, and others may be bad guys. But they are about to be replaced by even worse bad guys.

We can only pray it doesn't get worse. As far as the attack on Lara Logan and other women in Egypt, I don't expect a response or condemnation from Joy Behar, Whoopi Goldberg, Code Pink, or any other feminist in this country. It would go against their complete acceptance of Islam and all of its brutal practices.

Monday, February 14, 2011

Friday, February 11, 2011

Regarding the Egyptian people.

I read an excellent bit over at Hyphenated American about how a "revolution is only as good as its people."

Based on Zogby International's study,


  • 85% have an unfavorable attitude toward the U.S.
  • 87% have no confidence in the U.S.
  • 92% named the U.S. as one of two nations that are the greatest threat to them
  • 4% said if they had to live in another country they would choose the U.S.
  • 52% have an unfavorable opinion of the American people
  • 65% agreed with a statement that clergy must play a greater role in our political system
  • 86% say Iran has a right to pursue its nuclear program
  • 79% say it would be positive if Iran acquired nuclear arms
Now that Mubarak has stepped aside, who is going to fill the vacuum of power? It is very likely a strict, anti-American, anti-Israel regime that allies with Iran could take shape. 

While the slumbering sheep in the West gleefully watch in misguided support as the Egyptian people make their voices heard, no one seems to be contemplating the inevitable ripples that will occur across the world from such a power shift.

While most Americans express support for the Egyptian people, so does Hezbollah, Hamas, and Iran.

What does that tell you?

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

The man who will beat Obama.

We are inching closer and closer to campaign season for the presidency and it's time the right wing unites and backs up a viable candidate who has a legitimate shot at defeating Obama and grinding his left wing wrecking ball to a halt. This post is both to persuade and inform. I made my choice a long time ago, and I feel it is the very best one.

How bad do you want it? What would you do to guarantee Barack Obama is denied another term and another four years to destroy as much as he possibly can? Whoever is nominated to challenge the tyrant, it will take sacrifice from all factions of the right wing. The Palinites, the Paulites, the Huckabee evangelicals, and Levin libertarians. The Tea Party and the GOP. All will have to come together behind whoever is put forth.

I'm going to come right out and say it without sugarcoating a thing. Sarah Palin cannot win. Not she will not win, she CANNOT win. It's time to put aside the religious fervor for Sarah and come back to reality. She's a conservative warrior no doubt, a great speaker, and a powerful woman. However, she is not only unfit for the presidency just as Obama was unfit for the presidency, her charisma will not extend beyond the ranks of her camp within the right. She will never capture the independent vote. You and I both know this.

In order to beat Obama, the GOP needs to put forth a candidate who is as attractive, energetic, intelligent, and mainstream just as Obama appeared to be in 2008. We need a candidate who will go toe to toe with him on any issue. Not a crusty, bumbling fool like John McCain or a walking, talking left wing Christmas present like Sarah Palin has made herself out to be. I want you to imagine Barack Obama and Sarah Palin in the presidential debates. He would carve her up like a Thanksgiving turkey.

Ron Paul? Forget it. His views are too radical for independents and most conservatives, and his clear inability to defend America from her enemies will most certainly cost him an avalanche of Republican votes. Mike Huckabee? Again, he will capture the evangelical, and likely most of the GOP base, but his religious almost theocratic stance will drive away the independent vote, handing Obama nearly every swing state. Mitt Romney? He has no chance. And why? He is far too liberal for a true conservative to vote for him. So we can end it right there.

That leaves only one candidate standing who, in my eyes, has the only realistic shot at dethroning the tyrant. That candidate is Congressman Paul Ryan of Wisconsin. This isn't my first post of Paul Ryan. I've admired him since his constant fearless stands taken against Obama during the toils of the healthcare debate in 2009 and 2010. Ryan proved himself the only person willing to challenge the left head on, not with raging emotion, but with objective fact, arguments backed up by reason, and on an entertaining note, scathing ridicule when it was due.

Here's why Paul Ryan has the best chance. He has a combination of a) Limited government/conservative ideology that will appeal not only to the right, but center as well, b) Exceptional speaking and debating skills that will make Obama look like a fool and c) Attractive outward appearance and persona, which is just what the Republicans need.

When is the last time the Republicans put forth a fresh, exciting, young candidate? Ronald Reagan. Not only does Paul Ryan strangely look like Reagan, he possesses a Reagan like charisma that has the potential to capture the vote not just of the right, but those sitting on the fence as well.

Give Paul Ryan a thought. He has the best chance. He is the Antidote.

Paul Ryan on Obamacare
Paul Ryan rebuts MSNBC host
Paul Ryan vs. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz on Obamacare
Paul Ryan tells Obama he isn't listening to the people!
Paul Ryan vs. Democrat Carolyn Maloney
Paul Ryan on repeal
Paul Ryan vs. Democrat Richard Neal

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

The tolerance of the left. Hang Clarence Thomas!

Listen to these raaaacist Tea Part--I mean leftists voice their opinions of Justice Clarence Thomas.



Aren't these the people that so often claim to be on the side of the minorities? These are the tolerant, progressive, peace lovers? Ha! Liberal rallies are like cesspools of writhing, grotesque maggots congregating and swimming in a pile of green crap, their ideology. They are fraudulent, intolerant, militant, violent and prejudiced, all while screaming their opposition as being exactly that.

Who are 21st century liberals really? They are a far distant cry from the classical liberals of old, such as the Founders. The classical liberals stood for liberty, hence the term liberal. Today, "liberals" stand for the exact opposite. Modern day liberalism is an ideology of intolerant fanatics with no principles of definition. Modern day liberals stand for nothing other than their own existence, and the imposition of their world view on others. Their world is gray, they have no allegiance. They are inherently violent and vulgar; their rallies tell the tale. They have no sense of reason, purpose, or decency. They hate those who are different from them. That is the 21st century "liberal". One who stands not for liberty, but totalitarianism, and the "good of all".


Oh, and has anyone heard from the NAACP on this? L O L

Monday, February 7, 2011

Left wing academia breeds stupidity

Have you ever met a person who was so smart they were actually stupid? Listen to this clip and you'll know exactly what I mean. I highly encourage you listen to the whole fourteen minutes.



To anyone who has been through any American college or university you know all too well the type. There is a difference between book smarts and common sense. Liberal academia is infested with over intelligent idiots who pride themselves in their extended vocabulary and ability to cite random fun facts of nothingness. Like the caller, they have a special knack for talking for extended periods of time but actually saying absolutely nothing. Notice a few things.

-his complete disregard for definition/embrace of universal relativism ("You said good and bad, what does that mean?")
-his worship of social Darwinism
-his hopeless worldview
-his admission of treason/weakness ("If you can't beat them, join them.")


Embedded within the liberal academic community is a certain stupidity that only an academic can master.

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Christina Aguliera butchers the national anthem.

Not only did she get the words wrong, but she absolutely disgraced our anthem with her ridiculous attempt at molding it into her own pop driven "unique" version.



Let's get something straight. There should be no genre style versions of the national anthem. I'm sick and tired of seeing pop stars try to make the national anthem their own. Disgraceful and NOT entertaining. I shouldn't have to cringe when hearing the song.

This is how the anthem should be sung...

Video: Strange lights over Jerusalem

Real or fake? You decide.