tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5381810032134613287.post7995822169348868417..comments2024-01-22T04:11:11.654-06:00Comments on Hack Wilson: Why I will never side with Ron Paul and the modern day libertarian movement.Hackhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00939367013876552898noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5381810032134613287.post-51384125805533227612010-09-22T10:01:53.885-05:002010-09-22T10:01:53.885-05:00With all due respect, the cold hard fact of the ma...With all due respect, the cold hard fact of the matter is that the "official" story on 9/11 IS a farce (google "WTC Building 7 collapse" for example), and the entire "war on terror" is a massive hoax.<br /><br />While I don't like Islam or Muslims personally, they are NOT responsible for the 9/11 attacks. They were <em>framed</em> for the attack (and you guessed it, by the Israelis and their lackeys) in what is called a "false flag" attack. By the way, ever wondered why we are fighting all of the Israelis' enemies in all these Mid East wars??<br /><br />Now...I'm sure by now you and your other readers may be dismissing my argument as some "lunatic conspiracy theorist" or "jew hater." But the reality is that I'm telling the truth, which anyone can discover should they question the "official" media/government line and investigate the facts for themselves.<br /> <br /><br />I'll leave you with a few "smoking gun" examples which should open the eyes of anyone with a few working brain cells. Look into the 1967 attack on the USS Liberty navy ship by the Jewish state of Israel and the 1946 King David Hotel Bombing. These are two blatant (and now admitted) examples of "false flag" attacks where the Israelis were trying to frame muslims for terrorist attacks.<br /><br />links:<br /><br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing" rel="nofollow">1946 King David Hotel Bombing</a><br /><br /><a href="http://thy-weapon-of-war.blogspot.com/2010/07/1946-king-david-hotel-bombing-zionist.html" rel="nofollow">more</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/margolis12.html" rel="nofollow">1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty</a>SoldierofYahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03771076368340865129noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5381810032134613287.post-62159361657354866962010-09-21T18:23:29.167-05:002010-09-21T18:23:29.167-05:00Blowback is a cop-out, so 9/11 was blowback for De...Blowback is a cop-out, so 9/11 was blowback for Desert Storm (where we came to the aid of an friendly nation), which was blowback for supporting a dictator in Iraq, which was blowback for balancing power between Iraq and an unfriendly Iran, which was blowback for supporting the Shaw of Iran, which was blowback for resisting Soviet global expansion, which is blowback, from stopping Hitler's invasion of Russia... ETC ETC ETC... Where does it end? Sometimes you have to take a stand, and if not us then "who"? I guarantee your not going to like the "who"... What happens when "who" comes knocking on our shores? Would it have been better that Nazi Germany or Imperial Japan were our planet's superpowers now, how about Soviet Russian? If it were not for our willingness to fight back the world would be a darker place. I can see trimming away some of the fat in the military, not trying to be EVERYWHERE, ALL THE TIME. But when we are attacked, to not respond and blame ourselves, invites more attacks.Brigandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05555844258567289228noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5381810032134613287.post-17001932927935006042010-09-21T11:47:41.181-05:002010-09-21T11:47:41.181-05:00Look, I feel your pain on the conspiracy theories....Look, I feel your pain on the conspiracy theories. It's a small but vocal minority of Ron Paul supporters who usually much prefer the rants of Alex Jones to the legislative updates of John Tate and C4L. <br />If you listen or read the reasoned RP supporters, you'll find their abhorrence to America's current foreign policy to be that it is violent, vindictive, and unpredictable. Most supporters of Dr. Paul believe "blowback" was responsible for 9/11, not some dark NWO "inside job" that Bush planned. <br />Blowback is a documented factual phenomenon and is a term used by our CIA to describe incidents that occur as an unexpected reaction to an action. Think Newton's Third Law of Motion. <br />Our government is not the only one creating blowback around the world but we certainly generate enough. In 1953 when the CIA overthrew Mosadeq, the Democratically elected President of Iran, that created tension which eventually boiled over into the Iranian revolution and the 1979 hostage crisis.<br />I could go on and on, but I don't want to write a blog commenting on one. <br />Ron Paul doesn't demand unanimous conformity of thought. He doesn't even expect you to agree with him on everything. All that he asks is that you think about it. What if our foreign policy caused 9/11? What if our support for brutal right wing dictators (err I mean the "free world") around the world has stirred up anti-American sentiment? <br />We should (need to) be able to have a logical discussion about these things. We have an irrational OFFENSE in this country, not national defense. The DOD should have its named changed back to the "War Department" so that we actually understand what it is they do.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5381810032134613287.post-76937246107480604122010-09-21T00:58:48.204-05:002010-09-21T00:58:48.204-05:00Thank you all for the input!Thank you all for the input!Hackhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00939367013876552898noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5381810032134613287.post-25362583116093336012010-09-20T19:55:29.362-05:002010-09-20T19:55:29.362-05:00A great post and a vital one. We need the "w...A great post and a vital one. We need the "whole" package from potential candidates. This guy has too many holes in the program.Cec Moonhttp://zionbeckons.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5381810032134613287.post-16049882439122447372010-09-20T17:12:10.479-05:002010-09-20T17:12:10.479-05:00I couldn't agree with you more. I was an earl...I couldn't agree with you more. I was an early Ron Paul fan prior to the 2008 election. I still get my campaign for liberty emails and do think Ron is a great voice on domestic issues. He says he is for a "strong" national defense... But his plans don't seem to add up. I could never support him for president. <br /><br />Now his son Rand? Thats different, currently I feel Rand potentially could run well in 2012.Brigandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05555844258567289228noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5381810032134613287.post-8438287488941020072010-09-20T17:00:23.316-05:002010-09-20T17:00:23.316-05:00USA has its military presence in alot of foreign c...USA has its military presence in alot of foreign countries backing up a you will do as America says mentality cos we are the only ones that are right.<br />Dont you think that attitude might just annoy a few countries. Its like the big USA bully imposes itself on the world playground...and what happens in the playground eventually every one gets annoyed with the bully and does him/her over.<br /><br />A few Islam types have got together to deal to the bully.<br />If the bully was a better person in the first place there would be no fight.<br />Ron Paul is incredibly right on this issue. USA cant afford its world presence, and that very presence is creating its own enemies. Its time to back off the scene.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5381810032134613287.post-7548237593282724612010-09-20T14:32:18.083-05:002010-09-20T14:32:18.083-05:00"If the Founding Fathers were here today, the..."If the Founding Fathers were here today, they would most certainly go to war with the Islamic extremists who show deliberate intention to bring us to ruin."<br /><br />Would they also be for permanent bases in South Korea, Germany, Spain, and Japan? Would they be supportive of spending billions upon billions of dollars of the taxpayers money to protect other nations? <br /><br />Look, while I agree with going after Jihadists, I don't like spending billions on protecting other countries.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5381810032134613287.post-59160681511326039002010-09-20T14:29:00.240-05:002010-09-20T14:29:00.240-05:00Hack, you are way off. That doesn't make you ...Hack, you are way off. That doesn't make you a "NeoCon"; it makes you a Pro-Defense libertarian as opposed to Paul who is an Anti-Defense libertarian. NeoCons are a totally different breed of animal.Eric Donderohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02763399145451696076noreply@blogger.com